2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose

[Turtle]

i dont agree with Ra. actually i disagree with them fundamentally.

'path of self' is not a possibility for anything apart from the infinite existence (of us all). because, no finite entity can express or embody infinity in its finite existence, and no finite entity will ever become infinite, never, ever.

that is why the path of negativity ends early 6th density, because it can not go any further.

Where is the disagreement? Both you and Ra are saying that the path of self exists, but it will not lead you back to rejoining the infinite creator that you truly are. Wait...you mean you disagree with Ra fundamentally throughout the books, not just this subject? Can you clarify for me?

-------------------------------------------------------------------

About the morality thing, I completely agree with you. Of course when Ra says there is no right or wrong morals, they are speaking about their own perspective, as well as the perspective of infinity. Right and wrong morals exist as truth only to those who wish to see it that way.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

it would be like regressing to live like a crocodile, despite you are currently a human now.

There are reasons for doing this. A curious being of a higher plane desires to briefly incarnate as a moth in order to experience the thrill of that first flight out of a cocoon.....

Not to mention the millions of wanderer's who chose to regress and take on the human shell at this time. I feel that I must be a wanderer, and I feel very foolish for coming here let me tell you, lol.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

trying to practice the higher laws in a lower density will be unwise, at its best.

I agree, and disagree.

So many factors to consider on this one before I can claim anything I did in my past as wise or unwise. The message Q'uo makes a big deal of, is the one about doing vs being...and that we are truly just here to be ourselves. A very high density philosophy and approach to living, this "radiancy of being" they speak of. And yet it seems so unwise to focus chiefly on that while you are in this 3d sphere because you would seem to be an apathetic fool who has a smile on his face, while his friends are finding various causes to champion...to make a difference they can measure in their world.

Being vs Doing...Q'uo says either focus is acceptable, appreciated and worthy. It is all a matter of choice/perspective essentially.

Godspeed!