Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies L/L Research Channeling Archives 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose

    Thread: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose


    unity100 (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 4,502
    Threads: 152
    Joined: May 2010
    #5
    05-30-2010, 05:17 PM (This post was last modified: 05-30-2010, 05:18 PM by unity100.)
    (05-30-2010, 05:07 PM)Turtle Wrote: Well, it's like Ra said. The negative path is just the path of "that which is not"...meaning you are NOT all important and above your slaves if you are some 5d STS master. You are just compounding the illusion you are already in by believing that. You ARE your slaves, you are one with the all.

    i dont agree with Ra. actually i disagree with them fundamentally.

    'path of self' is not a possibility for anything apart from the infinite existence (of us all). because, no finite entity can express or embody infinity in its finite existence, and no finite entity will ever become infinite, never, ever.

    that is why the path of negativity ends early 6th density, because it can not go any further.

    Quote:There is no right or wrong (morally).

    i actually think there is. lets have a brainstorm :

    how about we just allow an environment in which a single entity (you, or me or anyone) can actually destroy the central sun of this existence, and devastate and destroy this current universe ?

    because there is no right and wrong, this wouldnt be a problem. everything would be perfect, because we are all one. lessons would be learned. everything would be alright.
    .........

    not. actually it would be dead wrong, because, obviously, the current universe is past that level of evolution. it doesnt need such an experience, and it is not at the point that it could or should have such an experience.

    it would be like regressing to live like a crocodile, despite you are currently a human now.

    .............

    therefore, i very much think, because all these high laws we speak of only find their total application at the point of infinite existence, and not any place before that, for us, finites, there is always a right, and wrong, in regard to wisdom, love and balance.

    only when we are again united and together in the infinite existence that is 'us', there will be no right or wrong, and there will be Law of One.

    in any level below that, trying to practise the higher laws in a lower density will be unwise, at its best.

    Quote:I remember something about the previous universe not having this dichotomy of STS and STO...and that the "theme" or whatever you wanna call it in that universe was one of "the mover and the moved". Sounds pretty interesting, like a less complicated version of the whole Good VS Bad thing in this universe (or is it only local to this galaxy?). Can you imagine what the underlying principle or schism of the one, would be in the next octave? It thrills me to imagine this.

    im suspecting that there wont be a duality, inefficiency, a non-path like we have now. ie, negativity path.

    this seems to be a creation in which the creation is expected to learn wisdom. when the wisdom is learned, i think, the need for any abomination will be history.

    that being said, i cant glimpse the possibility of what might be the general theme of the next octave.
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked unity100 for this post:1 member thanked unity100 for this post
      • Confused
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 04:09 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 04:41 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 04:52 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 05:34 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 09:43 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 11:16 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-18-2010, 08:41 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-18-2010, 11:29 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Confused - 02-11-2011, 11:37 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 02-12-2011, 04:52 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Confused - 02-12-2011, 06:32 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 05:07 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 05:17 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by David Junior - 09-20-2011, 02:24 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 05:36 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 05:43 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 05:49 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 06:08 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 06:35 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 06:43 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 06:59 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Cyclops - 05-30-2010, 06:59 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Observer - 12-08-2011, 06:23 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 07:18 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 07:23 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Cyclops - 05-30-2010, 10:05 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Peregrinus - 05-31-2010, 12:38 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-31-2010, 06:56 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Confused - 02-26-2011, 03:01 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-10-2011, 04:19 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-10-2011, 10:03 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-14-2011, 12:57 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-31-2010, 04:43 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by peelstreetguy - 05-31-2010, 11:11 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-31-2010, 01:27 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-31-2010, 08:02 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-31-2010, 10:49 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-01-2010, 07:16 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by LsavedSmeD - 06-01-2010, 10:43 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-02-2010, 12:33 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-02-2010, 05:35 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-02-2010, 05:50 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 06-02-2010, 06:20 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-01-2010, 06:10 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 06-01-2010, 08:52 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-01-2010, 09:55 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 06-02-2010, 01:55 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by LsavedSmeD - 06-02-2010, 02:30 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-02-2010, 03:44 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by thefool - 06-01-2010, 10:19 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 06-02-2010, 05:13 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-03-2010, 03:30 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-03-2010, 04:31 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-04-2010, 06:21 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by LsavedSmeD - 06-04-2010, 10:40 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 11:23 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-04-2010, 12:45 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 12:57 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-04-2010, 06:26 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-05-2010, 01:59 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-04-2010, 11:54 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 12:31 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-03-2010, 06:07 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-03-2010, 06:30 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by LsavedSmeD - 06-05-2010, 12:18 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-05-2010, 12:30 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-04-2010, 09:48 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 09:55 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-04-2010, 11:18 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 08:27 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by crystl37 - 06-04-2010, 10:17 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 10:22 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-05-2010, 11:34 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-05-2010, 12:07 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-05-2010, 07:12 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-06-2010, 03:04 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-07-2010, 11:41 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-07-2010, 12:39 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-07-2010, 06:14 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by crystl37 - 06-05-2010, 07:53 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-05-2010, 11:26 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by crystl37 - 06-06-2010, 07:06 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-06-2010, 08:23 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Cyclops - 06-06-2010, 11:58 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by xlsander - 06-07-2010, 05:25 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-08-2010, 12:09 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-07-2010, 01:28 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-07-2010, 03:30 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-08-2010, 03:29 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-08-2010, 03:07 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-08-2010, 03:30 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-09-2010, 05:34 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-09-2010, 11:03 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-08-2010, 09:54 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-08-2010, 08:51 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-09-2010, 10:46 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-09-2010, 11:33 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-09-2010, 12:12 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-09-2010, 11:02 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-09-2010, 11:06 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-09-2010, 12:09 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-09-2010, 12:46 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-09-2010, 01:22 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-09-2010, 06:53 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-09-2010, 07:20 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-10-2010, 07:38 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Cyclops - 06-10-2010, 12:33 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 06-10-2010, 04:39 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-10-2010, 11:50 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-10-2010, 02:36 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Aaron - 06-10-2010, 02:21 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Truth_and_Love - 06-10-2010, 02:38 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-10-2010, 03:04 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Aaron - 06-10-2010, 03:40 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-10-2010, 03:50 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-11-2010, 05:13 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 08:42 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 11:22 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-11-2010, 11:40 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 11:56 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-11-2010, 03:13 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 07:10 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 08:39 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 08:59 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 09:10 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 09:22 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 09:51 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 09:57 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 10:05 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Cyclops - 06-11-2010, 10:27 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 10:34 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 11:32 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by thefool - 06-12-2010, 09:29 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-12-2010, 12:08 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by lightning - 07-09-2010, 09:06 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Joseph326 - 07-02-2010, 06:11 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Pablísimo - 07-09-2010, 03:41 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 03:49 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by airwaves - 07-12-2010, 12:59 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-12-2010, 01:05 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by airwaves - 07-12-2010, 01:18 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-12-2010, 01:58 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 08:19 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 09:24 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 10:51 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 11:38 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 12:03 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 12:10 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 12:16 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 12:50 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 12:54 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 01:04 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 01:53 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 02:46 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 03:06 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 03:14 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 03:20 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 03:39 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 03:44 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 03:48 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 03:50 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by airwaves - 07-17-2010, 05:43 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-19-2010, 10:32 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-20-2010, 06:17 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-20-2010, 11:53 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by yossarian - 02-11-2011, 10:01 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 02-11-2011, 10:23 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by yossarian - 02-12-2011, 12:32 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by kycahi - 02-12-2011, 12:45 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Oceania - 09-10-2011, 06:42 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Confused - 09-10-2011, 06:45 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by zenmaster - 09-10-2011, 01:35 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-10-2011, 01:54 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Oceania - 09-12-2011, 11:40 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 09-12-2011, 02:42 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by 3DMonkey - 09-10-2011, 10:12 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-12-2011, 12:03 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by kycahi - 09-12-2011, 12:43 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Oceania - 09-12-2011, 12:49 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Oceania - 09-12-2011, 02:56 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Unbound - 09-20-2011, 12:26 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 09-20-2011, 12:36 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Oldern - 09-20-2011, 06:14 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 09-21-2011, 05:54 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by zenmaster - 09-20-2011, 08:35 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 09-20-2011, 08:55 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-21-2011, 03:33 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by fr33d0m - 12-08-2011, 09:37 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Plenum - 07-29-2012, 09:25 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Siren - 07-29-2012, 09:58 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode