03-30-2014, 06:51 PM
(03-30-2014, 06:25 PM)michael430 Wrote:(03-30-2014, 03:55 PM)zenmaster Wrote: He also suggested that Ra had conflated the term solar system and galaxy, yet Ra knew of the differences very well and insisted on using the term galaxy due to their experience with time/space.
I think there was a thread here very recently talking about this. Ra calls a solar system a galaxy, and a galaxy a LOGOS....right?
"We use the term known to your people by the sound vibration complex “galaxy.” We accept that some galaxies contain one system of planetary and solar groups, others containing several. However, the importance of the locus in infinite time/space dimensionality is so little that we accept the distortion implicit in such an ambiguous term."
There is just as much of our solar system in time/space as there is in space/time. We are largely ignorant of that condition, however. In time/space things are associated by like-natured resonance or affinity rather than by spatial proximity. However, the opportunity to express like-natured resonance is going to be determined to some degree by the characteristics offered by the space/time, spatially proximate, logos common to the groups.
Where things are resonant in time/space, the spatial distance which separates them does not matter as far as ability to communicate information or share their beingness. The Reciprocal System of Theory would explain non-local (time/space) phenomena such as Einstein's spooky action at a distance as entities being coupled in a time/space dimension (a "hidden variable").