03-30-2014, 04:57 PM
On the second commentary, Mandelker says there is more human distortion in the connotation of the phrase "out of control" = "dangerous and destructive". "So safe and helpful and acceptable is in control?" so you see how language has been co-opted to serve the negative agenda"
Ok, I call bullshit on the negative agenda and that phrase in this case. He is merely using "control" as a trigger word and totally disregarding the various connotations of "control" which rely on context, just as the term "ego" or "love" strongly rely on context. The negative use of control is where bypassing of acceptance is used for some type of domination purpose, *always*. However, when something is "out of control", the implication is simply where one is *not conscious of their behavior*. Utterly amazing what people try to get away with.
"In fifth density the manifestation of the physical complex is more and more under the control of the conscious mind complex"
"The calling of the adept may be likened to those nerve and muscle actions over which the mind/body/spirit complex has conscious control."
Ok, I call bullshit on the negative agenda and that phrase in this case. He is merely using "control" as a trigger word and totally disregarding the various connotations of "control" which rely on context, just as the term "ego" or "love" strongly rely on context. The negative use of control is where bypassing of acceptance is used for some type of domination purpose, *always*. However, when something is "out of control", the implication is simply where one is *not conscious of their behavior*. Utterly amazing what people try to get away with.
"In fifth density the manifestation of the physical complex is more and more under the control of the conscious mind complex"
"The calling of the adept may be likened to those nerve and muscle actions over which the mind/body/spirit complex has conscious control."