03-29-2014, 08:38 PM
(03-29-2014, 08:17 PM)neutral333 Wrote: Well thanks for the enthusiastic scientific reductionist responseBy pointing out the explanation as reductionistic, you are suggesting the basis of physical expression is nonreduced. It is from this vague, nonreduced idea that you dwell in fascination. Ra was asked about and offered a (mundane) explanation for these differences and further offered that the study of this variety was not a fruitful endeavor. Of course, any non reduced fantasy-notion idea has a potential to serve as personal allegory, in which case you are affectively asking for interpretation of your free association. The personal unconscious is always interesting.