Can the Choice Be Absolute (i.e. 100% pure)?

[vervex]

Love is in all things. Is it different when given to the other or given to the self? What defines this difference? The question that remains is the love for the self negative when not used against others?

The difference is between running water like a river and contained water such as a lake or pond. When love is kept solely for the self, it is done by adding the energy to deep red-orange-yellow distortions, the distortions thus used as the reservoir for the energy. Control is then gained by pushing to the blue-ray to use the co-creative nature for control, bypassing the heart center.

When love is shared with others then the heart opens up and the connecting forces which allow love to move between fields creates a flow up from the lower chakras to the blue-ray. Thus the individual is constantly being renewed and bathed in new energies, whereas the purely self oriented individual continues to amplify and compress the same energies and distortions at its core, even if new energy is drawn inwards.

Thus, to the water, or to the love, it is the same. The water is the water, the love is the love. However, water has many uses and many contexts. Sometimes it is free-flowing and sometimes it builds on stagnancy. It can become part of a pleasant stream or a decaying bog.

Thus, the difference then is circulation. Love that is circulated only within the self creates a vortex which will draw or absorb energy from others, even if energy is offered to tempt to control. This energy is circulated solely within the self and is used entirely to the designs of the individual's desires. Love that is circulated with others is returned amplified, and the energy is therefore added to not just each individual's system, but the sharing actually creates new systems and connections between the individuals, further energizing both.

It is pointless to attempt to discern polarity based on the access to the tool of polarization. That Love may be found anywhere is a positive point, and works towards positive polarization, because the negative would see love only for themselves.

One might suggest that one could love oneself and not others and polarize positively but I think this is distinctly improbable as positive polarization, based on radiation, is at its core a loving of other selves, and hence the difference of the activation of the heart center, or not.

Your post confuses me a bit Tanner and gives rise to several questions which I would like to share:
- Is love, like water, a limited resource?
- Can love ever stagnate? Can it ever decay, even when kept within the self?
- Is compassion towards the self negatively polarizing? Is loving and accepting the self unconditionally a selfish act? Is forgiving and loving the self an act which depolarizes the lower chakras?
- How does one radiate love outwards?
- What would happen to an entity which radiates love outwards but has no love for the self?
- Is loving ever a disservice?

Feel free to share your own view