intended use of devices

[Sagittarius]

Cant polarize without intent was my point.

If that was your point why say something else that alludes to a conclusion that you know to be false? lol

Ra intended to serve others and caused harm many times in the past as well so what ?

The reason I brought up Maldek is because despite their intention to serve others they did not polarize positively and you did say that you saw polarization as intent so i thought it was worth mentioning.

STO in the fullest sense involves all of the STS discoveries which are playing out and have been since the start of the cycle.

No it doesn't lol. That discussion that doesn't belong here though I guess
I'll remind you that this current sub discussion was started when you falsely accused a member of contradicting themselves when they didn't, I feel obligated to answer when asked a question so i'm answering but lol let's just get back on topic.

Yes your right I should have elaborated more on my concept of intention, I was answering in the context of the situation and didn't think there would be a need.

Appears to me that they did contradict if I thought they didn't I wouldn't have said anything. I dont see how what I said is not apart of the topic. Intent isn't static the intent maldek found isn't the same we are finding here.

Well let's start a sub-discussion how can the full extent of positive polarization not involve sts ?

---

78.25 Questioner: Then you are saying as a result of the polarization in consciousness that has occurred later in the galactic evolution, that the experiences are much more, shall I say, profound or deeper along the two paths. Are these experiences independent of the other path or must there be action across the potentiated difference between the positive and negative polarity, or is it possible to have this experience simply because of the single polarity? This is difficult to ask.
Ra: I am Ra. We would agree. We shall attempt to pluck the gist of your query from the surrounding verbiage.

The fourth and fifth densities are quite independent, the positive polarity functioning with no need of negative and vice-versa. It is to be noted that in attempting to sway third-density mind/body/spirit complexes in choosing polarity there evolves a good bit of interaction between the two polarities. In sixth density, the density of unity, the positive and negative paths must needs take in each other for all now must be seen as love/light and light/love. This is not difficult for the positive polarity, which sends love and light to all other-selves. It is difficult enough for service-to-self polarized entities that at some point the negative polarity is abandoned.