02-13-2014, 12:18 AM
(02-13-2014, 12:05 AM)Tanner Wrote:Implicit to any and everyone reading this thread.(02-12-2014, 11:16 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(02-12-2014, 10:54 PM)Tanner Wrote:If it's just "the natural state", then why would that not be be implicit?(02-12-2014, 06:25 PM)zenmaster Wrote: But was the question about what enlightenment means?
How do you answer a question about the nature of something without addressing what it is? To answer the question, I say yes, those "enlightened" still have distortions, and rather an awareness of that fact.
Implicit to whom?
(02-13-2014, 12:05 AM)Tanner Wrote: I am communicating ideas, I do not know what assumptions others have made so I express what seems appropriate from my perspective.Why do you say you do not know what assumptions others have made, yet question the rationale behind not rephrasing "enlightenment"?