01-29-2014, 02:00 PM
(01-29-2014, 01:45 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(01-29-2014, 12:56 PM)Namaste Wrote:More specifically, why is there the appeal to an intermediate personality to intercede, on our own behalf, in order to provide info of such a personal nature. In other words, why develop an external "counterpart" messenger instead of direct, honest reflection. I agree, there are some opportunities for self exploration which are not provided by the societal mind which channeling may offer (i.e. due to response to a calling). However, why the more available, obvious existential conditions require illumination and framing by that which is transcendent (channeled entities) begs the question of what that surrogated role is actually reflecting internally as far as ability and willingness to be honest with self.(01-29-2014, 10:42 AM)zenmaster Wrote: Why is a channeled, disembodied parental character required to inform about that which is common sense?
We're all in this forum because we believe in exactly that, Ra, although to a much deeper degree than common sense; our entire point of existence.
There are illuminations that would require centuries of physical research and contemplation if not garnered by external, interdimensional teachings.
If I were not assured of the mind's limits in understanding foreign realities, I would have continued on a fruitless path despite assertions of this being so without backing and reasoning.