12-23-2013, 03:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-23-2013, 04:02 PM by Adonai One.)
I perceive an implication my assertion is simply an expression of over-intellectualization and escapism, which would be an ad hominem and does not dismiss my point. It's a way of perceiving why my point is made but not a way of disproving it.
While this might be a hidden implication, it's the most relevant intention. They are not necessarily wrong, just irrelevant.
Feel free to discuss my imbalances; however, that will only discredit my voice and not what comes from it.
Austin, erroneous or imbalanced logic can still produce correct conclusions. What you speak of is exactly an ad hominem.
While this might be a hidden implication, it's the most relevant intention. They are not necessarily wrong, just irrelevant.
Feel free to discuss my imbalances; however, that will only discredit my voice and not what comes from it.
Austin, erroneous or imbalanced logic can still produce correct conclusions. What you speak of is exactly an ad hominem.