Consider that change doesn't exist in how we think of it.
Instead consider that we're constantly flipping through an infinite amount of present realities. Some are different. Some of similar. But no one reality changes into another - they all exist, just is not presently experienced if that's not the one we're in. I don't believe in this form we can experience all realities simultaneously.
Is a curiosity to experience a seemingly unexplored (for some definition of unexplored) specific reality necessarily a reject of other realities? If the the self is the Creator, it is not fitting to create your own experience without rejection? Isn't that what the Creator does - when he creates anything, does he truly reject anything? If so, each and every creation of any free will is a rejection of other scenarios by that definition, and that doesn't fit with my understanding of the unity of creation. I believe that's what's so interesting about infinity. Distinct creations, yet all together in unity.
Nothing is rejected, all exists in reality. Perhaps in a different form, or once we're fully able to accept something in one reality we can start accepting multiple simultaneous realities. The Creator does not reject by creating; I don't think we don't reject by creating our reality. Where it gets confusing is that we can create reality through rejection and power and control, but we can also create reality through love and acceptance. The power-control-rejection scenario breaks down at high levels due to the holographic nature of each entity being the creator (so how can one have control over another that is really itself), whereas the love and acceptance scenario is consistent with the holographic nature of consciousness. I'll have to flesh out and think about these ideas a bit more.
To put another way, if I'm the Creator, and all entities are the Creator, and all realities exist simultaneous, then all realities are being accepted. Maybe I personally want to shift my point of view with another reality, but each reality has a version or multiple versions of me experiencing it if the reality as it has the Creator. I'm literally everywhere, as I'm the Creator...you are too. We're everywhere at once. Nothing is rejected, though we can deceive ourselves into thinking you aren't me, and therefore what I experience is different from what you experience.
My experience is your experience; we just haven't realized it yet in this paradox of time. The consciousness writing these words is a uniquely distorted form of the same but differently distorted consciousness that read these words, but ultimately we're the same consciousness. You, me, us and I are all talking to ourselves yo, and apparently we're having a blast
Instead consider that we're constantly flipping through an infinite amount of present realities. Some are different. Some of similar. But no one reality changes into another - they all exist, just is not presently experienced if that's not the one we're in. I don't believe in this form we can experience all realities simultaneously.
Is a curiosity to experience a seemingly unexplored (for some definition of unexplored) specific reality necessarily a reject of other realities? If the the self is the Creator, it is not fitting to create your own experience without rejection? Isn't that what the Creator does - when he creates anything, does he truly reject anything? If so, each and every creation of any free will is a rejection of other scenarios by that definition, and that doesn't fit with my understanding of the unity of creation. I believe that's what's so interesting about infinity. Distinct creations, yet all together in unity.
Nothing is rejected, all exists in reality. Perhaps in a different form, or once we're fully able to accept something in one reality we can start accepting multiple simultaneous realities. The Creator does not reject by creating; I don't think we don't reject by creating our reality. Where it gets confusing is that we can create reality through rejection and power and control, but we can also create reality through love and acceptance. The power-control-rejection scenario breaks down at high levels due to the holographic nature of each entity being the creator (so how can one have control over another that is really itself), whereas the love and acceptance scenario is consistent with the holographic nature of consciousness. I'll have to flesh out and think about these ideas a bit more.
To put another way, if I'm the Creator, and all entities are the Creator, and all realities exist simultaneous, then all realities are being accepted. Maybe I personally want to shift my point of view with another reality, but each reality has a version or multiple versions of me experiencing it if the reality as it has the Creator. I'm literally everywhere, as I'm the Creator...you are too. We're everywhere at once. Nothing is rejected, though we can deceive ourselves into thinking you aren't me, and therefore what I experience is different from what you experience.
My experience is your experience; we just haven't realized it yet in this paradox of time. The consciousness writing these words is a uniquely distorted form of the same but differently distorted consciousness that read these words, but ultimately we're the same consciousness. You, me, us and I are all talking to ourselves yo, and apparently we're having a blast