12-09-2013, 07:23 PM
Question:
What is the role of the positively polarized person in regards to activism? For instance should one just accept the actions of a controlling negative action hurting another being, or should one stand up for those who can't stand up for themselves and fight against an exploitive agenda? Take for example the civil rights movement in the past and parallel that with our current environmental issues. Martin Luther king jr. Had a letter he wrote discussing how the biggest hinderence to justice was not the few extremist, but rather the many people who were accepting of the extremist' actions.
How do you see this issue in the framework of polarizing positively and accepting actions that are not consonant with the Law of One?
What is the role of the positively polarized person in regards to activism? For instance should one just accept the actions of a controlling negative action hurting another being, or should one stand up for those who can't stand up for themselves and fight against an exploitive agenda? Take for example the civil rights movement in the past and parallel that with our current environmental issues. Martin Luther king jr. Had a letter he wrote discussing how the biggest hinderence to justice was not the few extremist, but rather the many people who were accepting of the extremist' actions.
How do you see this issue in the framework of polarizing positively and accepting actions that are not consonant with the Law of One?