The question is, if these historical examples emphasize this significant error where people believe themselves to be on the positive path, when they aren't, what is so easily being misunderstood?
"The negatively oriented being will be one who feels that it has found power that gives meaning to its existence precisely as the positive polarization does feel. This negative entity will strive to offer these understandings to other-selves, most usually by the process of forming the elite, the disciples, and teaching the need and rightness of the enslavement of other-selves for their own good. These other-selves are conceived to be dependent upon the self and in need of the guidance and the wisdom of the self."
So-called positive people have found "the way", where others are asleep (useless cattle?), and need their guidance, correct? Because in spiritual circles, I see a lot of talk about "the others", who need to wake up. So when Ra says negatives have found meaning precisely as positives have, it's possible they're saying the structure of thought is the same (personal correctness..that we're all potentially flirting with the negative path), but how we make use of our illumination makes all the difference.
Are you out to save others? Do you know what's best? I'm even repeating this same pattern now, but I'm conscious of it at least. What's important also seems to be detachment from outcome, so there is no battle of wills. But most importantly, I spend a lot of my time attempting to see myself in all experience, which seems to be the greatest tool for remaining "positive"..whatever that is.
I feel a crystallized being is one who is more concerned with seeing themselves in all others, experiencing themselves, therefore evening/balancing experience out..making it regular. Because a fully unblocked yellow ray only wishes for another's happiness, not destroying their reality (perhaps the analogy we're looking for in this thread?). The needs of another and the approach can then be analyzed.
"The negatively oriented being will be one who feels that it has found power that gives meaning to its existence precisely as the positive polarization does feel. This negative entity will strive to offer these understandings to other-selves, most usually by the process of forming the elite, the disciples, and teaching the need and rightness of the enslavement of other-selves for their own good. These other-selves are conceived to be dependent upon the self and in need of the guidance and the wisdom of the self."
So-called positive people have found "the way", where others are asleep (useless cattle?), and need their guidance, correct? Because in spiritual circles, I see a lot of talk about "the others", who need to wake up. So when Ra says negatives have found meaning precisely as positives have, it's possible they're saying the structure of thought is the same (personal correctness..that we're all potentially flirting with the negative path), but how we make use of our illumination makes all the difference.
Are you out to save others? Do you know what's best? I'm even repeating this same pattern now, but I'm conscious of it at least. What's important also seems to be detachment from outcome, so there is no battle of wills. But most importantly, I spend a lot of my time attempting to see myself in all experience, which seems to be the greatest tool for remaining "positive"..whatever that is.
I feel a crystallized being is one who is more concerned with seeing themselves in all others, experiencing themselves, therefore evening/balancing experience out..making it regular. Because a fully unblocked yellow ray only wishes for another's happiness, not destroying their reality (perhaps the analogy we're looking for in this thread?). The needs of another and the approach can then be analyzed.