10-15-2013, 10:09 PM
(10-15-2013, 10:00 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(10-15-2013, 02:41 PM)Tanner Wrote:And why are you not simply projecting your own ego?(10-15-2013, 07:00 AM)zenmaster Wrote:(10-15-2013, 01:52 AM)Tanner Wrote: I am just confused, would famous people just not reincarnate? Aha
What you are confused about is the merely possible always being the actual case because you want it to be so. Aha
No I am confused because the "merely possible" is frequently discounted because it is "merely possible". Why is the finger always pointed towards grandiose seeking suggesting every such individual has some ego void to fill? Why are the unlikely situations always scoffed at?
I just don't understand how exactly people external to the individual can claim an individual is running off of "ego desire" without actually just projecting their own ego.
(10-15-2013, 01:52 AM)Tanner Wrote: How exactly could one know whether or not another is genuinely in the truth of themselves?And why would that matter one iota either way? If they are "in truth of themselves, why would that matter? If they are not in truth of themselves, why would that matter? You can "be in the truth of yourself" and think you have been, are, and will be anything and everything. The people of Maldek were "in the truth of themselves" when they destroyed their world. yay.
Swish.............