08-25-2013, 02:56 PM
(08-25-2013, 01:02 AM)rie Wrote: I wonder what a relationship between highly balanced people look like, who enjoys independence and freedom...Well that independence and freedom is relative of course. The more you know yourself the more acceptance that is available. That acceptance is what potentially allows a great deal of space for people to grow as well as a natural recognition of what constitutes a healthy relationship.
(08-25-2013, 01:02 AM)rie Wrote: By that point I think many choose life as a monk I would think lol.I'm thinking the monastic life is not quite integral, but rather focused on spiritual or higher matters. In order to "bring heaven to earth" you really need to have a bridge constructed to "earth". And that bridge is forged from deep experience and appreciation for the aspects of the human condition which are of the personal and social nature. Once touched, it's quite easy to remain with your head in the clouds while not bothering to balance the lower centers. However, to me the purpose of this density is specifically to balance the lower centers - because that's where the specific focus is by design.
(08-25-2013, 01:02 AM)rie Wrote: Like Krishnamurti explained when asked why he did not marry: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAFR6V3KvEwI dunno, I'd have to agree about what Ra says about that efficient mirroring effect. Seems like a wise choice to make as part of recognition of one's needs. Plus sex, duh.
(08-25-2013, 01:02 AM)rie Wrote: I guess the societal ideal of romance and relationship peaks expectation of what relationships are supposed to be like. I mean, attachment/bonding is considered 'normal' and could be healthy in psychology (but modern psychology focuses exclusively on lower centers).As the average vibration is raised, conventional psychology will address pathologies present in the higher vibrations as well. We are currently attempting to create a "new-age" culture and there is tremendous confusion and distraction created by "frames" or memes made of what may be suggested by the newly apprehended transpersonal aspect of self. The ridiculous eschatological allegories from Wilcock, the banal quasi-mysticism of the higher-density channeler, the hi-jacked science memes such as "what the bleep", "the secret", etc. All of that is an exploitation of the inevitable pre-trans fallacy which is a shamefully growing industry. People who know better and try to point out the pathological meme are the targets of projection by those possessed by their fallacious ideologies.