Expression of self and its symbolic interaction is an interesting thing. If a person states a certain opinion about something that others may feel to be negative, controlling, or restricting, the action of chiming in about the nature of that person's opinion to defend another is a contradiction. Because in the act of attempting to defend the expression of someone, you're denying the expression of the other to think, feel, and express what they feel the need to express. It's all very silly you see! If we were all balanced, we should be able to say and state whatever without getting all bent out of shape about it.
Even pointing all this out is a contradiction, as I'm limiting the limiter who perceives a limiter. There's no way around it, as it's a paradox. Every moment is full of this stuff in your interaction with others, between right and wrong, and illustrates the unity and infinity in thoughts themselves I think. The idea is to be conscious of it.
I can understand how there is no right or wrong. I think that's part of what the choice attempts to illustrate, that this blurring between right and wrong creates an unknowing, and that there is only what you may find useful to yourself and others at any one time. One needs to have faith in themselves, and to love and express themselves in the attempt to serve others. When you express yourself and pursue your own individual path honestly, you begin noticing what's working and what isn't by how it affects others. Then you can balance that and be in a better position to serve. The more you work with expressing yourself, the more you get off your chest and less begins to bother you as you give in to catalyst. You're then able to get yourself out of the way, as there is less of a need to express personal opinion overtly. This allows you to be in a place to simply offer what another may be asking of you in a more balanced manner, rather than reacting to catalyst constantly by trying to fashion someone in your own image.
Even pointing all this out is a contradiction, as I'm limiting the limiter who perceives a limiter. There's no way around it, as it's a paradox. Every moment is full of this stuff in your interaction with others, between right and wrong, and illustrates the unity and infinity in thoughts themselves I think. The idea is to be conscious of it.
I can understand how there is no right or wrong. I think that's part of what the choice attempts to illustrate, that this blurring between right and wrong creates an unknowing, and that there is only what you may find useful to yourself and others at any one time. One needs to have faith in themselves, and to love and express themselves in the attempt to serve others. When you express yourself and pursue your own individual path honestly, you begin noticing what's working and what isn't by how it affects others. Then you can balance that and be in a better position to serve. The more you work with expressing yourself, the more you get off your chest and less begins to bother you as you give in to catalyst. You're then able to get yourself out of the way, as there is less of a need to express personal opinion overtly. This allows you to be in a place to simply offer what another may be asking of you in a more balanced manner, rather than reacting to catalyst constantly by trying to fashion someone in your own image.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)