07-29-2013, 05:50 PM
I have been mulling over the Logos or Love, myself, and how that is said to be the second distortion. Free Will caused awareness, and then that awareness was concentrated in to a focus and that focus is labeled as such Love or Logos.
Each aspect of the Creator, which is the Logos (although in this context I do not believe they said "The One Infinite Creator"), or Love, thereby has some form of free will, although therein lies a paradox that one may choose to not have that free will.
This is peculiar to me, as if free will is anterior to love, then where does one go if they choose that they no longer want nor desire their free will and let it go?
What is a distortion of a distortion? They say first distortion, second distortion and third distortion, but does that mean each one builds upon the previous, is that what "one, two, three" means? Are these in themselves not the cause of all things? Awareness, love and, of course, intelligent energy.
There is then Intelligent Infinity. This concept of infinity as a "thing" is very interesting because it does actually define an infinity which is in some unfathomable way still definable by the fact that it is profoundly intelligent.
What is "an infinity"?
Each aspect of the Creator, which is the Logos (although in this context I do not believe they said "The One Infinite Creator"), or Love, thereby has some form of free will, although therein lies a paradox that one may choose to not have that free will.
This is peculiar to me, as if free will is anterior to love, then where does one go if they choose that they no longer want nor desire their free will and let it go?
What is a distortion of a distortion? They say first distortion, second distortion and third distortion, but does that mean each one builds upon the previous, is that what "one, two, three" means? Are these in themselves not the cause of all things? Awareness, love and, of course, intelligent energy.
There is then Intelligent Infinity. This concept of infinity as a "thing" is very interesting because it does actually define an infinity which is in some unfathomable way still definable by the fact that it is profoundly intelligent.
What is "an infinity"?