07-05-2013, 05:06 PM
(07-05-2013, 02:29 PM)Philosoraptor Wrote:Regardless of where you would draw the line, the point is that it already has been drawn de facto from its popularization by different individuals and groups. D.W. Ascension2000, resurrection, judgement day, Photon Belt, Omega Point, etc notions are at odds with the notion of harvest at a fundamental level. It may be about semantics, but principles are understood accordingly.(07-04-2013, 11:30 PM)zenmaster Wrote:For what it's worth (and it might be worth-less!), I wouldn't really draw that thick of a line between transitioning to a 4th-density bodily form whilst incarnate (DNA/genetic mutation) and transitioning to 4D by recycling/reincarnation of old 3D space/time vehicle for new 4D one.(06-29-2013, 12:49 PM)Philosoraptor Wrote:Ascension is the notion of the incarnate transformation from one level to a higher level of existence. Modifications to the story range from natural DNA changes (typically more strands), to mastery of the physical form or meditation techniques which enable change, to induced spiritual energy from a photon belt etc. While harvest is the notion choosing to live a new incarnation in a higher-vibrational vehicle. The veil not amenable to making such a conscious choice for evolution, yet that choice is obviously required.(06-27-2013, 01:15 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Harvest is not the same as ascension.
Care to elucidate on that?