All that I have learned about "The Creator" is this...

[Unbound]

Hmm, also I would say that emotion and all other subjective experiences are no less valid nor any less impactful than any objective perception. If one wants to be the Creator, they have to take responsibility for every single part of creation.

Everything and everyone is the Creator, so there is movement between parts of the Creator which naturally organizes itself in to systems of patterns and motions. This is why densities exist as perceptions at all.

Yes, everything is here and everything is everywhere, but the fact remains that everything is what it is until it is changed by the universal mind, the very electricity of its thought being its will.

We are the universal mind in thought and our minds are fractals of the universal mind. We are equal to the universal mind, yes, but equality on an energetic level is different from "sameness".

If we have a set of 100, and we give each of its parts a binary function, such as aware/not aware, and say we can apply a change in that function in ANY of the parts of the set of 100.

We know that the total "potential" of the system is 100, the most number of possibilities for awareness. So, lets say a couple of the set have become aware. Generally we might say the first 3 of the set of 100 have become "kinetic", or active, and now have a set of 100 differentiated by two states, of which 3 are one, and 97 are the other.

We have now just created two new sets, that being 3, and 97, which can be subset once again or more even. We do this for every single combination possible of active and inactive states in the total set of 100 which now logically has hundreds of sets within it.

If we then consider that 100 is also a subset of a greater set, like 1000, then we can begin to see the pattern of microcosm and macrocosm.

Lets say now that each new cycle is defined by the numbers themselves, 1 through 9. Each threshold is defined by a rebirth but with a layer of "completion" as its foundation. Thus the 1 becomes the 10, the 2 the 20 and the 3 the 30. Cycles are also microcosmic and macrocosmic. 1 to 9 is one cycle. 10 to 90, by tens, is the next. Then 100 to 900 by hundreds and so on. One could also apply this to octaves, but I am using more of a tetractys concept.

So, where am I going with all this?

Lets define our set as 100 people, and we'll say they are differentiated by awareness in terms of unity. Thus continuing the aware/not aware model.

Now, suppose that in order for the entire 100 people to realize themselves as part of the next greater set, there needs to be a certain percentage of the individuals who have to be aware, to create "momentum" towards the next set. In order for total realization of the inclusion of the next set, absolutely all 100 must be aware, because only realized as a unified 100 will they realize their place in relation to the 1000. I do not mean this as heirarchical, but as ratios.

Do you see then the difficulty of the realization of ALL experience? Do you realize that there is so much yet to occur and yet to be done?

Yes, everything is, has been, and will be, but what will YOU do? I ask this question to everyone.

---

My friend, when did I ever deny any of this? Haha.

At which point did you establish I was opposed to you? I am philosophisizing.