05-12-2013, 10:00 PM
(05-11-2013, 10:31 AM)plenum Wrote: first up, I'm not a big fan of the terms introversion/extroversion, but for the purposes of this thread, I'll try to use them as best I understand how they are understood popularly.
first of all, there seems to be a feeling that 'extraversion' is the more healthy state or alignment of an individual. And somehow that 'introversion' is a deficiency, and if one is an 'introvert' it needs to be defended in some way, or the benefits of introversion listed.
if we go with that understanding, that introversion (popularly understood) implies things such as shyness, withdrawal, excessive need for privacy, unwillingness to share the self, feeling threatened by others, etc etc then it would seem to fit some definition of an 'orange ray blockage', or a lack of sense of personal power in the face of others.
I also understand that this 'version' of introversion is perhaps the cliched understanding of what introverts are as perceived by extroverts. So it may be inherently unbalanced lol.
but I think most will acknowledge that the qualities listed above are inhibiting to the self if one wishes to be a broader actor on the canvas of life.
I can acknowledge these orange ray blockages in myself quite readily; and coming to acknowledge them seems to be a great first step in liberating them.
I think they are only blockages to the extent that such "introversion" negates a natural inclination to be more "extroverted."
So for example, if you want to be sociable, yet have difficulty doing so, that would be indicative of a blockage. However, if one had little inclination to do so when following their natural impulses, it would not be indicative of blockage.
Blockages can be perceived in a variety of ways, but the easiest from my frame of reference is emotion. That is the greatest indicator of balance or imbalance I have seen to date. How you feel is everything. Emotions are essential spiritual tools.
When you feel bad, there is, without exception, blockage.