04-22-2013, 07:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-22-2013, 07:33 PM by Adonai One.)
(04-22-2013, 04:55 PM)rie Wrote: Just curious - why do you refer to creator as a 'he', third-person?
As our reality is defined, there currently exists a distinction. Yes, this distinction is illusionary but as I stand today, I still stand under this illusion. To pretend there is no distinction between me and the creator whatsoever would be unproductive just as the wisest STS entity currently sees himself as god in the lone, segregated wilderness that is his existence.
When my perception has completely merged with the light, then I can fully say I am The Creator. That day shall come for all of us. However, I will not hinder my progress by pretending I have already attained the power and the omnipresence of The Creator.
Simultaneously, yes, perfection is here but some of us must define our work within the context of creation for it to have meaning. We can reject the illusion entirely but that's like turning a chess board on its face. I will play the game for as long as it is meaningful and/or when I am sucked into the vacuum that is 7th density due to collecting the maximum amount of spiritual mass.
<hr />
With that said, I may not have understood the core of your question. I use "He" as gender-neutral. I rather not call The Creator "It" as an animal or thing.