(04-18-2013, 11:52 AM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(04-18-2013, 10:04 AM)Phoenix Wrote: This cause is very good I think, aside from the problem of the price
What do you mean by 'aside from the price?' Eating vegetarian is a lot cheaper.
I understood the article to be about humane farming methods. I was thinking that the meat would be more pricey.
(04-18-2013, 11:52 AM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(04-18-2013, 10:04 AM)Phoenix Wrote: it is a way of increasing ethics without desiring to violate the free will of those who do wish to eat meat.
That's a sticky dilemma, being that those who eat meat are violating the free will of those who don't wish to be eaten.
The law of free will doesn't modify itself if we don't like the other persons decisions.
(04-18-2013, 11:58 AM)caycegal Wrote: I wonder if all 2D beings have free will or only those which are transitioning into 3d. For example, I have never felt bad about eating fish (as long as the water they lived in was cleanish.) It is obvious to me that cetaceans, apes, many or most dogs and cats, are not strictly 2D. Cetaceans may be completely 3d. Don't know exactly where the others on my list here fall.
The Bible would seem to suggest that Jesus ate fish - but who knows.
Hey Caycegal. I don't think I've ever spoken with you before.
I don't precisely know the inns and outs of free will. I imagine that the orange ray prana or whatever it is called, includes killing and being killed so perhaps entering the environment is a free will choice. But I don't really know with these matters.
I know with dogs though, the general gist is people apply more emotion to animals than they actually have. They kind of project onto them.