Wanderers and the Harvest

[zenmaster]

Then what you are saying is care in polarization (if that is possible), which again is not at all necessary to return to native density.

No. That's not what I'm saying. But yes, its possible to take care in polarization. The way we act toward others can be (especially in more conscious entities) a deliberate conscious act, so of course one can take care in polarization.

All you have to do is say, in retrospect, that "the course is not as originally planned" to say that the entity did not "take care". Which of course is silly. One can't judge their own polarity any more than you can judge another's. People resonating with their sincere, "highest good" will be "taking care" and still polarize negatively. Understanding is not of this density, so it's silly to say "take care".

I'm saying that if they demonstrate a significantly negative orientation towards other-selves, then they don't necessarily return to their native density, as that Ra quote said very clearly. So they have to care how they treat other selves (and how one treats other selves is a function of polarity).

And that degree of significance is called "polarity", which is what you were saying, whether or not you want to acknowledge it.

So wanderers may do as they like, but if that involves significantly STS behavior (i can't imagine what else "negative orientation towards other selves" would mean if not "service to self"), they wouldn't necessarily return to their native density.

Which no one but the OP had claimed.