03-01-2013, 04:31 AM
@the OP, thank you for further tempering the knowledge I have come to starting with reading the LOO. Your first posts contain utter fabrications (the 'death cult' thing is rediculous). Your later posts heavily patronize anyone responding to you. You then are supported by someone who registered quite awhile ago but only has been online for 3 hours and just so happen to read your post out of all the other numerous threads. This second person then posts this quote:
Doing this to the person who is asking the questions would then not leave a choice in what to believe. So would following an incarnate 'master' who is in an equally fallible 3rd density mind/body/spirit. Giving over power/free will to another is a service to self activity.
Also from what I read of your crazy long post(about half), the dialogue feels like its only one person speaking. ie, cooked dialog. Also, I see a liberal usage of the strawman.
Another general thing which was said (essentially) that you can't know the source of channeling, so you can't trust what is being said. This isn't true at all since the message is what should be emphasized, not the messenger. Negative material can be discerned from positive.
Axel Wrote:How many times have you heard someone channel another being that was “getting on the channeler’s own case” and telling them they’d better get their act together, and change, or behave selflessly. Probably never.
Doing this to the person who is asking the questions would then not leave a choice in what to believe. So would following an incarnate 'master' who is in an equally fallible 3rd density mind/body/spirit. Giving over power/free will to another is a service to self activity.
Also from what I read of your crazy long post(about half), the dialogue feels like its only one person speaking. ie, cooked dialog. Also, I see a liberal usage of the strawman.
Another general thing which was said (essentially) that you can't know the source of channeling, so you can't trust what is being said. This isn't true at all since the message is what should be emphasized, not the messenger. Negative material can be discerned from positive.