(01-31-2013, 10:43 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:Sure. Etiquette is an obvious tacit social obligation which strives for balance. It's also a constraint which challenges convenience. Overriding the perceived need for etiquette is the mindset where such obligations are beneath one's efforts. The justification for ignoring etiquette is the perception that the need for dialog formalities has been subsumed by a more encompassing attitude of acceptance or an overriding assumption as to the potential value of teaching/learning.(01-31-2013, 09:52 PM)zenmaster Wrote: It seems that for one who can simply justify their actions as being "accepting" then etiquette is beneath their efforts.
Can you explain what you mean here?
I've seen people on this forum edit posts for content and meaning rather than for grammar or spelling, if they can get away with it. Intentions do change, especially after someone subsequently points out errors in thought. And it does seem at least somewhat "unfair" to those who have already responded to the expressed intention, and confusing to others. However, the revisionism isn't as bad as the unnecessary assumptions, knee jerk reactions, and puerile ego-drivin spiritual-pride that members express.