Nice find, thank you!
Have you read Graham Hancock? I believe there is at least one more city like this that has been found recently. He talks about that in his "underworld" series on the tube, if I remember correctly. It might be the same city, but I don't think so.
Another factor to add to the discussion is that science is not always as open and progressive as one would like to think. Especially not when paradigms and special interests are threatened by the wrong kind of evidence. Egyptology is perhaps the best example, but I imagine it's like the top of an iceberg.
Fringe areas are usually ignored and ridiculed, such as the paranormal, higher intelligence in animals and plants, the nature of consciousness, ancient civilizations - anything really that threatens the model. If it wasn't for the internet you'd still have to go to the library to investigate interesting things. There you'd find like five books on the shelf of "controversial phenomena". All five of them completely useless.
Thank god for the internet!
Have you read Graham Hancock? I believe there is at least one more city like this that has been found recently. He talks about that in his "underworld" series on the tube, if I remember correctly. It might be the same city, but I don't think so.
Another factor to add to the discussion is that science is not always as open and progressive as one would like to think. Especially not when paradigms and special interests are threatened by the wrong kind of evidence. Egyptology is perhaps the best example, but I imagine it's like the top of an iceberg.
Fringe areas are usually ignored and ridiculed, such as the paranormal, higher intelligence in animals and plants, the nature of consciousness, ancient civilizations - anything really that threatens the model. If it wasn't for the internet you'd still have to go to the library to investigate interesting things. There you'd find like five books on the shelf of "controversial phenomena". All five of them completely useless.
Thank god for the internet!