02-21-2010, 12:18 PM
(02-21-2010, 11:27 AM)thefool Wrote: My thoughts exactly...
You are banking on carbon dating to be dot on. What makes it that accurate? There are assumptions in the process and wrong assumptions may lead to inaccuracies. No wonder you hear new scientific theories about the old stuff every day...
That's true. However I also don't like to discount all that we can learn with science because people can be wrong or have been wrong previously, at least I don't think it's a good idea in my opinion. Radio carbon dating is a bit variable as Ayadew mentioned, but only in so far as people make mistakes in what they are examining. The process itself, in measuring the decay rate of the carbon atoms, is highly accurate. That said, you can't carbon date stone, so yes, it isn't something to bank on completely with regard to the pyramids.
(02-21-2010, 11:27 AM)thefool Wrote: The time difference is so insignificant anyway, does it change anything? Or are you trying to assess Ra's validity with dates matching? Ra is valid because it resonates or invalid if it does not...
There was a time when this was true, but not anymore. I've had too many subtle cosmic clues that Ra's message of Oneness is valid. Resonance too. I'm not trying to determine Ra's validity, rather just trying to rectify what modern science & archaeology says with what my favorite spiritual source of wisdom says. It's an intellectual pass time for me at the moment. I also don't believe Ra couldn't have been wrong
