01-02-2013, 02:28 PM
Spero,
I am a heterosexual male. (according to the majority of social opinion), which is what Ra was attempting to convey.
It is the majority opinion of populated living conditions which establishes the more prominent views and opinions as the 'norm' or the most widely accepted with that set of views and opinions.
When living in a place where majority opinion does not matter as much because the differences are not separated by greater numbers, one would naturally not be subjected to the differing opinions as much.
Thus a more populated social setting would create an increased separation between the majority opinion and minority opinion.
This is why we all, regardless of orientations, sexual or otherwise, tend to gather in places where we find like-minded company.
Unfortunately there are many who do not appreciate that opportunity to gather in such comfort zones, and would strive to impose their ways on those who would not be comfortable with them.
These ruin the whole aspect of social tolerance and compromise for the sake of comfort and sharing spaces. Society as a whole has certain rights as well as its particular components. And individual components of society should tolerate and compromise for that opportunity just as they ask for the same in return.
If one believes that they should be able to have sex with their mate anywhere at any time, then they should also realize that in order to live in a large social structure and be able to enjoy that opportunity, they must consider the higher priority of all that share that space with them.
Do what you want in the privacy of your home.
Do not impose your freedom on the freedom of others. Grant the same sanctity to freedom that you place on it, to others who also deserve it as much as you do.
I do not consider myself a heterosexual, nor a homosexual. Nor am I what many would call gay.
The physical gender of my birth form has nothing to do with who I am, or what preferences I have.
It is simple genetic reproduction according to design. Just because certain parts are reproductive organs does not mean that they must therefore decide the orientations of desire.
If you are attracted to anything, it is a natural attraction based upon your entire self aspect. Why should the majority opinion of a social structure even be considered as a means of governing one's natural attraction. That in itself is an unnatural expectation.
Unfortunately, it is the majority of opinion.
I believe that a person should follow their attractions and enjoy whenever someone else is able to share that attraction with you.
But I also believe that there are certain interactions that are so intimate that they should not be shared in a public setting.
That is what the door is on the bedroom for.
Who's business is it what the hell we are doing on the other side of that door as long as they don't have to be subjected to it?
My parent's didn't have sex in front of us kids.
Why would they?
Why would we want to see it?
Most people would be appalled at the idea, and yet there are many who believe that they have a right to express their sexual frolicking anywhere they choose without regard for a social structure at all.
It is not the aspect of society which attempts to manage a comfort setting for all, that becomes the imposer in those cases. Rather it is the individual aspect of society which wants to impose its intolerance of others on everyone, for some sense of imposed acknowledgement of their choices and orientations.
I have no problem with homosexuality at all, except to say that it is not conducent to reproduction, or the natural child bearing form of human family development. The family suffers when it is void of either the male or female influence. Families can certainly be raised without issue in lieu of the perfect family setting, but without the male and female roles one of those nurturing values will be missed and reveal its consequence in some way.
There is some sense of loss when the human family individually loses one aspect of its gender, just as the human which is actually, genetically, both female and male, loses something from the full experience when it lives without one of those influences in its maturing experience.
Everyone, in a perfect setting, deserves the experience of both a mommy and a daddy.
Perfect settings are rare and few between. And even there the perfection of that setting would be scarred by the imposition of the parents on the children where the parent's intimate physical sharing was forced upon the little ones.
Like a family, we must all be considerate of each others spaces and comfort levels.
And when that doesn't work both ways, from both sides, designations are made by the majority experiencing it.
Normal? What the hell is normal?
Imposition? Well we all know what that is, and it really only has one definition.
Do what you will, but know that you reap the consequences both as an individual and as a whole.
Remember this if you are a homosexual that would like to be able to bring your child to a parade without having them exposed to S&M.
And remember this if you are a heterosexual that would like your gay child to be able to walk through town with one they are attracted to without being stoned to death.
I am a heterosexual male. (according to the majority of social opinion), which is what Ra was attempting to convey.
It is the majority opinion of populated living conditions which establishes the more prominent views and opinions as the 'norm' or the most widely accepted with that set of views and opinions.
When living in a place where majority opinion does not matter as much because the differences are not separated by greater numbers, one would naturally not be subjected to the differing opinions as much.
Thus a more populated social setting would create an increased separation between the majority opinion and minority opinion.
This is why we all, regardless of orientations, sexual or otherwise, tend to gather in places where we find like-minded company.
Unfortunately there are many who do not appreciate that opportunity to gather in such comfort zones, and would strive to impose their ways on those who would not be comfortable with them.
These ruin the whole aspect of social tolerance and compromise for the sake of comfort and sharing spaces. Society as a whole has certain rights as well as its particular components. And individual components of society should tolerate and compromise for that opportunity just as they ask for the same in return.
If one believes that they should be able to have sex with their mate anywhere at any time, then they should also realize that in order to live in a large social structure and be able to enjoy that opportunity, they must consider the higher priority of all that share that space with them.
Do what you want in the privacy of your home.
Do not impose your freedom on the freedom of others. Grant the same sanctity to freedom that you place on it, to others who also deserve it as much as you do.
I do not consider myself a heterosexual, nor a homosexual. Nor am I what many would call gay.
The physical gender of my birth form has nothing to do with who I am, or what preferences I have.
It is simple genetic reproduction according to design. Just because certain parts are reproductive organs does not mean that they must therefore decide the orientations of desire.
If you are attracted to anything, it is a natural attraction based upon your entire self aspect. Why should the majority opinion of a social structure even be considered as a means of governing one's natural attraction. That in itself is an unnatural expectation.
Unfortunately, it is the majority of opinion.
I believe that a person should follow their attractions and enjoy whenever someone else is able to share that attraction with you.
But I also believe that there are certain interactions that are so intimate that they should not be shared in a public setting.
That is what the door is on the bedroom for.
Who's business is it what the hell we are doing on the other side of that door as long as they don't have to be subjected to it?
My parent's didn't have sex in front of us kids.
Why would they?
Why would we want to see it?
Most people would be appalled at the idea, and yet there are many who believe that they have a right to express their sexual frolicking anywhere they choose without regard for a social structure at all.
It is not the aspect of society which attempts to manage a comfort setting for all, that becomes the imposer in those cases. Rather it is the individual aspect of society which wants to impose its intolerance of others on everyone, for some sense of imposed acknowledgement of their choices and orientations.
I have no problem with homosexuality at all, except to say that it is not conducent to reproduction, or the natural child bearing form of human family development. The family suffers when it is void of either the male or female influence. Families can certainly be raised without issue in lieu of the perfect family setting, but without the male and female roles one of those nurturing values will be missed and reveal its consequence in some way.
There is some sense of loss when the human family individually loses one aspect of its gender, just as the human which is actually, genetically, both female and male, loses something from the full experience when it lives without one of those influences in its maturing experience.
Everyone, in a perfect setting, deserves the experience of both a mommy and a daddy.
Perfect settings are rare and few between. And even there the perfection of that setting would be scarred by the imposition of the parents on the children where the parent's intimate physical sharing was forced upon the little ones.
Like a family, we must all be considerate of each others spaces and comfort levels.
And when that doesn't work both ways, from both sides, designations are made by the majority experiencing it.
Normal? What the hell is normal?
Imposition? Well we all know what that is, and it really only has one definition.
Do what you will, but know that you reap the consequences both as an individual and as a whole.
Remember this if you are a homosexual that would like to be able to bring your child to a parade without having them exposed to S&M.
And remember this if you are a heterosexual that would like your gay child to be able to walk through town with one they are attracted to without being stoned to death.