01-02-2013, 01:47 PM
(01-02-2013, 01:24 PM)Meerie Wrote: I don't resonate at all with what Jim says here, I would not make a distinction between heterosexual and homosexual relationships in terms of energy transfers, comes across a bit judgmental to me.
I don't think it's judgmental to acknowledge that some interactions might be more efficient, in certain ways, than others. Magnetic energies are very real. There's no question that gay couples face catalysts that hetero couples don't. But then, mixed-race couples face other catalysts that same-race couples don't. Couples compatible in height might have an easier time with sex than those who are mismatched in size or other physical attributes. Someone with a physical handicap faces certain catalysts not faced by those who don't have that handicap. (just to give some examples)
It's all just variations of catalyst. One type of catalyst isn't any better or worse than any other. I don't think it's judgmental to say, for example, that I face certain catalyst because I'm short. I'm going to have more trouble playing basketball than someone who is tall. It just is what it is.
Jim and Carla are so loving. They weren't being judgmental, but were just trying to acknowledge certain types of catalyst that gay couples might face. I think it's unrealistic to say that energy transfers are all the same. Energy transfers aren't even the same among hetero couples! One hetero couple might have much more efficient energy transfer than another. There are many factors that come into play, not just whether they are gay or hetero. But it is one of many factors.