12-14-2012, 10:51 PM
(12-14-2012, 12:12 PM)Siren Wrote: This is not to disagree with anything you have said, anagogy. I am just allowing myself the "benefit of doubt," shall we say, as to how sure I am that Intelligent Infinity equals absolute awareness! This is not an attempt to "muddle" thing, but perhaps more of a... sort of challenge, or catalyst, if you will. Either way, it's irrelevant, because there is no non-existence or non-INFINITY. It is nevertheless somewhat amusing to play around with all of this using mere words for concepts!
You are absolutely fine to question anything of the sort, Siren. :) Even if you don't agree on any particular topic.
The questions are good, and your perspective always welcome.
(12-14-2012, 12:31 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Do you think Ra might be distinguishing infinity (unaware) from intelligent infinity (aware)? "The Creator is the focusing of infinity as an aware or conscious principle called by us as closely as we can create understanding/learning in your language, intelligent infinity."
(12-14-2012, 12:12 PM)Siren Wrote: And yet Ra said: "I am Ra. Infinity became aware."
I always found that phrase very intriguing, to say the least.
Yes, it is a very intriguing statement. Especially in light of the following quotes:
Quote:27.4 Questioner: Would you define the word intelligent in the context of intelligent infinity?
Ra: I am Ra. We shall address the entire spectrum of this question before defining as requested. Your language, using vibrational sound complexes, can be at best an approximation of that which is closer to an understanding, if you will, of the nature of conscious thought. Perceptions are not the same as sound vibration complexes and the attempt to define will therefore be a frustrating one for you, although we are happy to aid you within the limits of your sound vibration complexes.
To define intelligent apart from infinity is difficult, for these two vibration complexes equal one concept. It is much like attempting to divide your sound vibration concept, faith, into two parts. We shall attempt to aid you however.
So if we are to accept this information, Ra appears to be saying the concept of "intelligent" cannot be separated from the concept of "infinity", because they equal one concept.
So then, what are we to make of the statement regarding the beginning of the creation story, when Ra says "infinity became aware"?
There is a clue in this section I believe:
Quote:13.16 Questioner: Could you tell me about this first density of planetary entities?
Ra: I am Ra. Each step recapitulates intelligent infinity in its discovery of awareness. In a planetary environment all begins in what you would call chaos, energy undirected and random in its infinity. Slowly, in your terms of understanding, there forms a focus of self-awareness. Thus the Logos moves. Light comes to form the darkness, according to the co-Creator’s patterns and vibratory rhythms, so constructing a certain type of experience. This begins with first density which is the density of consciousness, the mineral and water life upon the planet learning from fire and wind the awareness of being. This is the first density.
So, you see, it is not that infinity becomes "aware", as it was always aware/intelligent, but rather, it becomes *self* aware. This is a result of the first distortion: free will. The focusing into an organized "self" is the second distortion. The exploration of finity is the third distortion.
The exploration of the distortion "free will" or "choosing" naturally forms or necessitates and coalesces an organized "chooser". This chooser is the "Logos".