12-09-2012, 06:26 PM
(12-09-2012, 01:56 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:(12-07-2012, 05:25 AM)Ankh Wrote: It's just that if someone else feels more attracted to the thought of sending love to a specific entity or group of entities, there is room in the creation of doing that too, right?
Sure. There is also room in the creation for bloody wars. This isn't to say the two are equal. It is merely to say that there is room for just about anything.
Good point. It's an infinite creation where nothing is known.
Tenet Nosce Wrote:Ankh Wrote:I agree that sending STS entities love is an unasked service, but I do not agree that sending love would infringe upon their free will, because if it would, then Ra wouldn't be saying that sending them love is the most helpful catalyst in the above quote...?
Yes, but that whole discussion was made in the context of a negative greeting that was already occurring. That is different from actively seeking out negative entities and greeting them with love.
Good point too.
Tenet Nosce Wrote:Ankh Wrote:My belief is that sending love always works out well, if this sending is seated in the green ray or above and if there is no attachment to the outcome.
Those are some big "IFs". Not saying for you personally, but for people in general.
Well, here is where we have a problem perhaps. We are 3D beings. Not 4D, not 5D or 6D, but 3D (Ra, 16:59). Some of us are the so called Wanderers, with a spirit complex of another density with half-forgotten overlays of other lessons and densities (85:16). But no matter that, this is a density where we need to learn to love, if we want to graduate:
Ra, 85:16 Wrote:We may suggest at all times the constant remembrance of the density from which each adept desires to move. This density learns the lessons of love.
In third density we have three lower rays to work with, while we are learning ways of love. When we have learned without a significant distortion the activity called "loving", we graduate to fourth density (Ra, 27:13).
I think that most of the times the love offered, or the "green bombs" as you have called them, might perhaps not be pure green ray, but is of mixed orientation of orange and yellow rays as well. But people need to learn these ways of love in their own way, in their own pace, somehow, no? (Not speaking of this recent "Lucifer meditation" which has arised as a big discussion on this forum, but generally.)
Tenet Nosce Wrote:(12-09-2012, 12:47 PM)Meerie Wrote: What about stuff like the Gaia meditation, then? would that be an infringement according to your logic, as Earth never actually requested that?
Gaia is the planetary entity. It is a different set of considerations. But one of those considerations might be the fact that Gaia has decided to support the expression of negativity. Therefore, should we not honor her choice?
I would love to hear more of your thoughts upon this subject, if you have time, energy and desire. For instance, there is this Quote:
Q'uo 20010916 Wrote:We would recommend to each entity that within the meditative state one see the ruptures in this planet's beingness. Perhaps you can locate them geographically within your mind, seeing them as dark and hurting, in pain and confusion. And then, begin to bring the light and the love of the one Creator into the image. See that rupture of hurt and pain lightened by this love of the one Creator, shining forth through the eyes of all. Focus upon the injury, the hurt, and the pain until it is also as bright as the noonday sun.
"Gaia" is the planetary entity which consists of first, second and third densities. Third density mind/body/spirit complexes in my understanding, or we, as a "social memory complex", are giving birth to what "Gaia" will be. We are her parents. But I don't know what's "best" for Gaia...? She has indeed not requested love or healing, so even though Q'uo is encouraging us to send her love and light, is it infringement? What is your opinion about that?