I can sympathize with your perspective, Tenet. I'm unable to view the negative polarity as anything other than those who offer to drive the wedge of separation deeper, as a result of our own free will choices (mostly). So I don't see them as "responsible", other than offering a particular service..further distortion. All has its place. I can't say that their catalyst isn't needed for others. Indeed that must be the case, otherwise the catalyst would have been resolved.
Therefore, I'm not sure what I would be releasing the negative polarity from. Finding harmony in understanding the function of polarity is transformative enough it would seem, and is what Ra taught actually. Do I wish negative catalyst for others wasn't around? Of course. Should it be visualized as an object that no longer serves a purpose? I'm not sure, because each situation is unique and I don't want to deny or control something that may be necessary for another (covering up blockage). What I mean is that I don't want to provide only one option, which is the reason Ra suggests detachment from outcome. I can have positive personal bias in any given situation, which is my offering as part of the one infinite, but detachment allows for what is necessary, so that I don't stand completely in the way trying to control the infinite experiencing itself.
Here's a statement that may clarify..
The role of the healer is to recognize blockage, and if I just meditate for planetary blockage to be released, am I actually providing a "novel view of the self"? The healer communicates to the other what is actually wrong, so that recognition may occur and can be accepted. Wanting to love and forgive the negative polarity is a part of this communication, but you also have to take it a step further and offer a less distorted pattern. This can only be done by making the actual blockage known by way of acknowledging personal responsibility.
So if one wanted to structure a meditation, you could visualize the self as representative of the self existing in ignorance, and rather than directing forgiveness towards a perpetrator, as if they are the ones that are wrong, say "I'm sorry for what I've done to those that I love."
If acceptance is love, and I accept the roles that are necessary..well then there you go.
Therefore, I'm not sure what I would be releasing the negative polarity from. Finding harmony in understanding the function of polarity is transformative enough it would seem, and is what Ra taught actually. Do I wish negative catalyst for others wasn't around? Of course. Should it be visualized as an object that no longer serves a purpose? I'm not sure, because each situation is unique and I don't want to deny or control something that may be necessary for another (covering up blockage). What I mean is that I don't want to provide only one option, which is the reason Ra suggests detachment from outcome. I can have positive personal bias in any given situation, which is my offering as part of the one infinite, but detachment allows for what is necessary, so that I don't stand completely in the way trying to control the infinite experiencing itself.
Here's a statement that may clarify..
Quote:The function of the healer and crystal may not be over-emphasized, for this power of interruption must needs be controlled, shall we say, with incarnate intelligence; the intelligence being that of one which recognizes energy patterns; which, without judging, recognizes blockage, weakness, and other distortion; and which is capable of visualizing, through the regularity of self and of crystal, the less distorted other-self to be healed.
The role of the healer is to recognize blockage, and if I just meditate for planetary blockage to be released, am I actually providing a "novel view of the self"? The healer communicates to the other what is actually wrong, so that recognition may occur and can be accepted. Wanting to love and forgive the negative polarity is a part of this communication, but you also have to take it a step further and offer a less distorted pattern. This can only be done by making the actual blockage known by way of acknowledging personal responsibility.
So if one wanted to structure a meditation, you could visualize the self as representative of the self existing in ignorance, and rather than directing forgiveness towards a perpetrator, as if they are the ones that are wrong, say "I'm sorry for what I've done to those that I love."
If acceptance is love, and I accept the roles that are necessary..well then there you go.