12-02-2012, 08:32 PM
@Tenet
I understand what you are saying and where you are coming from as a Law of One purist, but from a more general perspective, I still find the concept of ascension fascinating due to the various reports, historical and otherwise, that coincide with the phenomenon. Whether its Jesus 'ascending' to heaven (leaving 3D sphere) or tibetan monks dissolving to light and leaving weird ectoplasm behind, I can't say one way or another if it plays into things or not.
I think David is a scholar of the Law of One, but I don't think he is exclusively that. I think we all draw from our breadth of knowledge and David is no different; I'd imagine his ascension 2000 or whatever phase probably greatly attributed to that distortion (if it is one
).
I kinda disagree. I understand why people get disillusioned with those topics, but I think it's all part of the puzzle. Being aware from a global perspective means you have to inspect the warts and the things that don't look pretty. If you are willing to do this, certain things become very clear and obvious, and unfortunately STS control is one of these things. I get sick of people stopping the train there and assuming that the only thing that comes from these things is fear, cowardice, laziness, and delusions. I'm the type of person who when I have cancer, I want to know I have cancer. I want to do everything I can to get rid of that cancer, but I can't fix anything if i'm ignorant of it. Another analogy is that of a shepherd - I want to know where the wolf lies so that I might protect my flock. So are these things so bad when we have the opposite side of the spectrum in the Mainstream Media? Why can't there be some push back?
I understand what you are saying and where you are coming from as a Law of One purist, but from a more general perspective, I still find the concept of ascension fascinating due to the various reports, historical and otherwise, that coincide with the phenomenon. Whether its Jesus 'ascending' to heaven (leaving 3D sphere) or tibetan monks dissolving to light and leaving weird ectoplasm behind, I can't say one way or another if it plays into things or not.
I think David is a scholar of the Law of One, but I don't think he is exclusively that. I think we all draw from our breadth of knowledge and David is no different; I'd imagine his ascension 2000 or whatever phase probably greatly attributed to that distortion (if it is one
).Quote:I think it is interesting that he has put so much time and effort into "ascension," "disclosure," "insider testimony," and the "Illuminati." I find it detracts from his credibility as a person and therefore, from the credibility of his work. I actually tend to see it as a distraction and a successfully executed manipulation tactic.
I kinda disagree. I understand why people get disillusioned with those topics, but I think it's all part of the puzzle. Being aware from a global perspective means you have to inspect the warts and the things that don't look pretty. If you are willing to do this, certain things become very clear and obvious, and unfortunately STS control is one of these things. I get sick of people stopping the train there and assuming that the only thing that comes from these things is fear, cowardice, laziness, and delusions. I'm the type of person who when I have cancer, I want to know I have cancer. I want to do everything I can to get rid of that cancer, but I can't fix anything if i'm ignorant of it. Another analogy is that of a shepherd - I want to know where the wolf lies so that I might protect my flock. So are these things so bad when we have the opposite side of the spectrum in the Mainstream Media? Why can't there be some push back?