(11-28-2012, 11:51 AM)Pablísimo Wrote: http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=42#6
Quote:42.6 Questioner: In the last session you made the statement that “We, that is Ra, spent much time/space in the fifth-density balancing the intense compassion that we had gained in the fourth-density.” Could you expand on this concept with respect to the material you just discussed?
Ra: I am Ra. The fourth density, as we have said, abounds in compassion. This compassion is folly when seen through the eyes of wisdom. It (compassion) is the salvation of third density but creates a mismatch in the ultimate balance of the entity
My take on that is that Compassion is pretty darn important in 3D (where we ARE now), especially at the end of the cycle. Ra didn't mince words.
That, and it is interesting that this extremely vital bit of information about our current incarnated density is in session #42. Session 42 of our very own Wanderer's Guide to the Galaxy.
Love to all
Good find! (And nice to see you, dear friend!)
Here's more of that session:
Quote:42.6 Questioner: In the last session you made the statement that “We, that is Ra, spent much time/space in the fifth-density balancing the intense compassion that we had gained in the fourth-density.” Could you expand on this concept with respect to the material you just discussed?
Ra: I am Ra. The fourth density, as we have said, abounds in compassion. This compassion is folly when seen through the eyes of wisdom. It is the salvation of third density but creates a mismatch in the ultimate balance of the entity.
I get the impression that many Law of One students stop reading right here.
(NOTE: The following comments aren't directed to anyone in particular, but are based on observations about many people's comments here at B4.)
Quote:Thus we, as a social memory complex of fourth density, had the tendency towards compassion even to martyrdom in aid of other-selves. When the fifth-density harvest was achieved we found that in this vibratory level flaws could be seen in the efficacy of such unrelieved compassion. We spent much time/space in contemplation of those ways of the Creator which imbue love with wisdom.
Many Law of One students seem to confuse "imbuing love with wisdom" with "blocking/turning off compassion."
It isn't wisdom to neglect compassion, in the density where compassion/love/service to others is the ticket to the next...the salvation of 3D in Ra's words.
Quote:42.7 Questioner: I would like to try to make an analogy for third-density of this concept. Many entities here feel great compassion for relieving the physical problems of third-density other-selves by administering to them in many ways, with food if there is hunger as there is now in the African nations, by bringing them medicine if they feel that there is a need to minister to them medically, and being selfless in all of these services to a very great extent.
This is creating a vibration that is in harmony with green-ray or fourth-density but it is not balanced with the understanding of fifth-density that these entities are experiencing catalysts and a more balanced administration to their needs would be to provide them with the learning necessary to reach the state of awareness of fourth-density than it would be to minister to their physical needs at this time. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. To a mind/body/spirit complex which is starving, the appropriate response is the feeding of the body. You may extrapolate from this.
Aha! There it is right there. Is this not crystal clear?
We observe the needs and suffering of others, whether it be pain, starvation, or whatever. The appropriate response is to offer service.
Not refrain from service out of some misplaced idea that in so doing we might throw ourselves out of balance. To be more concerned about getting out of balance ourselves with "too much compassion" than we are about serving others, would actually be serving self, which is the opposite of what's needed in 3D.
Quote:On the other hand, however, you are correct in your assumption that the green ray response is not as refined as that which has been imbued with wisdom. This wisdom enables the entity to appreciate its contributions to the planetary consciousness by the quality of its being without regard to activity or behavior which expects results upon visible planes.
"Green ray response is not as refined" means there should still be a green ray response! Not turn off green in favor of the loftier, higher ray responses. Furthermore, it isn't wisdom to turn off green at all!
The green ray response is what's most important here in 3D. So important that Ra said it's the salvation of 3D!
If possible, if we have the ability, then sure, let's imbue that response with 5D wisdom, absolutely! But let's not delude ourselves in thinking that we even have that wisdom at all, when in fact we might not and it might even be a trap to tempt us into blocking green, out of some sort of ego delusion that we are somehow 'above' green...'beyond such lower responses.'
Indeed, I've observed a number of people who seem to berate any show of compassion, as though it's just so...so...distasteful. As though anyone who shows compassion is clearly out of balance, clearly behind the times, clearly not very advanced. While they, of course, operate at a much higher level.
Let's suppose for just a moment that they're correct in that they are from 5D or 6D and the person they're talking to is a "mere" 4D. Is it really wisdom to tell an entity whose primary objective is to polarize, that they are somehow lacking because they don't yet have wisdom? Is it really wisdom tempered with love (or love tempered with wisdom) to elevate themselves above another with the idea that they are millions of years more advanced? They can think that all they want, but is it wise to tell that to a younger sibling?
Once again, to be clear, I'm not directing these comments at anyone in particular. I'm thinking more about the many posts I've seen, from various people, along these lines. There seemed to be a prevailing attitude that only those from 6D were in the 'in' crowd here at B4.
I question whether those people are from 6D at all. I didn't perceive their comments to be wise at all.
Quote:42.8 Questioner: Then why do we have the extreme starvation problem in, generally, the area of Africa at this time? Is there any metaphysical reason for this, or is it purely random?
Ra: I am Ra. Your previous assumption was correct as to the catalytic action of this starvation and ill health. However, it is within the free will of an entity to respond to this plight of otherselves, and the offering of the needed foodstuffs and substances is an appropriate response within the framework of your learn/teachings at this time which involve the growing sense of love for and service to other-selves.
Aha! So the situation is catalytic! It is catalyst; ie., an opportunity for other-selves to polarize by responding in love and service!
There it is right there. Sounds pretty crystal-clear to me!
Quote:42.9 Questioner: What is the difference in terms of energy center activation between a person who represses emotional responses to emotionally charged situations and the person who is balanced and, therefore, truly unswayed by emotionally charged situations?
Ra: I am Ra. This query contains an incorrect assumption. To the truly balanced entity no situation would be emotionally charged. With this understood, we may say the following: The repression of emotions depolarizes the entity in so far as it then chooses not to use the catalytic action of the space/time present in a spontaneous manner, thus dimming the energy centers. There is, however, some polarization towards positive if the cause of this repression is consideration for other-selves. The entity which has worked long enough with the catalyst to be able to feel the catalyst but not find it necessary to express reactions is not yet balanced but suffers no depolarization due to the transparency of its experiential continuum. Thus the gradual increase in the ability to observe one’s reactions and to know the self will bring the self ever closer to a true balance. Patience is requested and suggested, for the catalyst is intense upon your plane and its use must be appreciated over a period of consistent learn/teaching.
I think sometimes people have blockages and thus don't have full, spontaneous expression of green ray, and mistakenly think they're fully balanced and beyond emotion.
These same people often interpret passion and conviction in others as excessive, unbalanced emotion lacking wisdom. Which it may be in some cases, but an observer won't know the difference.
Why? Because the expression of love/compassion might be the same. Even the emotional response might be the same. The difference is in whether the person has any attachment to outcome.
John and Jane might both show an equally passionate response to starving children. Both are activists. At first glance, it might appear that they are same, in regards to their polarity and balance of love and wisdom.
However, John might be wise enough to know that there is no point to being attached to his desired outcome, whereas Jane (being 'merely' from 4D) might not have learned that yet, and thus gets very upset when her actions don't get the desired results.
The observer might not know that Jane gets upset, so John and Jane might look exactly the same. Both take action. Both show compassion. Both are passionate and have strong convictions. Both might even seem "extremist" to those who don't share their convictions. But, the observer doesn't know that Jane is attached to outcome, and John isn't.
The observer doesn't know that Jane is doing exactly what she should be doing, which is letting her green ray have full expression, now so close to Harvest. The observer doesn't know that John, too, is doing exactly what he should be doing: exactly the same thing as Jane, but with peace of mind and less attachment to outcome, because he has the wisdom to know that all will be well in the end. He just doesn't let that wisdom and knowing stop him from doing what is appropriate in the here and now. He has the wisdom to know that blocking his natural responses to catalyst, while in 3D, isn't wisdom at all.
Quote:42.10 Questioner: How can a person know when he is unswayed by an emotionally charged situation or if he is repressing the flow of emotions, or if he is in balance and truly unswayed?
Ra: I am Ra. We have spoken to this point. Therefore, we shall briefly iterate that to the balanced entity no situation has an emotional charge but is simply a situation like any other in which the entity may or may not observe an opportunity to be of service. The closer an entity comes to this attitude the closer an entity is to balance. You may note that it is not our recommendation that reactions to catalyst be repressed or suppressed unless such reactions would be a stumbling block not consonant with the Law of One to an other-self. It is far, far better to allow the experience to express itself in order that the entity may then make fuller use of this catalyst.