When i tried finding my highest/lowest point in the wave i kept an eye out for dates of being especially high on energy (with 18day periods between one another) where there wasnt any planetary or lunar influences present.
It gave me peak dates 9 days offset prior to the dates "eleve-seventeen" gave me.
Sadly both now seem to be faulty, as i feel as if being high and moving upwards... whilst one shows me being at -100%, the other at -34 going down...
The site i use for checking up on the moon is http://www.astronomy.com/
I've observed the moon to take effect 6% prior to being full/new/half, peak 1% past and fade 13% past.
and the planets http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Solar to check for aligning ones, the effect is usualy delayed just like with the moon, but tend to last for a week.
also, aaron, i knew someone by your name&age in umeå/nordmaling looking exactly like your pic ~five years ago... the similarities are driving me nuts, just had to mention it.
It gave me peak dates 9 days offset prior to the dates "eleve-seventeen" gave me.
Sadly both now seem to be faulty, as i feel as if being high and moving upwards... whilst one shows me being at -100%, the other at -34 going down...
The site i use for checking up on the moon is http://www.astronomy.com/
I've observed the moon to take effect 6% prior to being full/new/half, peak 1% past and fade 13% past.
and the planets http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Solar to check for aligning ones, the effect is usualy delayed just like with the moon, but tend to last for a week.
also, aaron, i knew someone by your name&age in umeå/nordmaling looking exactly like your pic ~five years ago... the similarities are driving me nuts, just had to mention it.