11-14-2012, 12:45 PM
(11-14-2012, 12:32 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Lacking... according to who's standard?
The standard of Ancient Wisdom and the result of evolution; Higher Being. Established and hidden securely in The Source Field.
(11-14-2012, 12:32 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Being a good custodian to the small ego self and being a good custodian to the planetary self is congruent behavior. Past a point, it would be impossible to do one without the other.
The difference between being impossible to do, or not, IS the very essence of evolving into Higher Being.
(11-14-2012, 12:32 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: You are certainly welcome to explore that belief. But let us then be clear in our discussions, that you do not acknowledge the Law of One.
I acknowledge the Law of One, as proposed by the Ra material, in my individual understanding and comprehension of it, and with the understanding that Ra is also restricted to those same limitations.
Let me ask you TN, do you accept the Ra material on faith that Ra has spoken complete fact and truth without possibility for mistake or misunderstanding on their part? If so, then you afford Ra, a group of individual thought processes, an omniscient attribute that contradicts their very essence.
(11-14-2012, 12:32 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Personally, the philosophy I have chosen is monism. This says, when the One became the Two, it did not cease to be the One.
And that very paradox is the Mystery, which by chasing, evolves The All.
The Mystery naturally asks, 'How can One be Two?"
Our experience is that there is no denying the Two.
Our quest is to understand The One.
We disagree only in what you would suggest as conclusion. But I never conclude anything when all is Mystery.