11-12-2012, 11:04 AM
(11-11-2012, 12:57 PM)Cyan Wrote: Theoretical pledge.
"I agree to give all of my joint subconcious the order to program my daily events hereforward so that when it is in absolutely no way interfering with what I wish to do conciously, then all unconcious answers and questions about animal rights and respect for animals should automatically say yes. Therefore I can say that my humanity respects animals. My individuality may make mistake."
If majority Aye! then "our view" humanity agrees to respect animals and we can refer to it in future conversations as de jure "my humanity".
All for?
Respect for ALL things created is a matter of character.
The process of discerning one's individual understanding and life choices is the natural process of divine design, and one which is very intimate and defiant of categorizations.
The paradox of the Other and The One is a Mystery which shall no be solved in polls of majority thought process.
One cannot please every one, all of the time because All is One. It is this very paradox which is the fabric of the existence of consciousness.
I have made four or five posts this morning after browsing from guidance to service to respect for others, and it seems that in all the main manifestation is that of the human need to categorize into specific understanding which they can then declare common and acceptable.
This may be democratic, but how common are the very few humans who reach higher states of being?