My only problem with that is we wouldn't be where we are without coming across someone who is already talking. Yet, Ra's very being seems to be a signal that is broadcast, but it's something that you have to tune into.
However, it's interesting that Ra described either 4th or 5th density beings providing channels as requiring naivety to provide the channel.
So my question is, do we have a role to play in making our knowledge available, or do we wait in silence?
That or wisdom led to feelings of superiority, which created a holy war, as has happened in our past.
I agree with your entire post..it seems to be the harmonious approach. I'm mostly stumped about the question I propose above.
However, it's interesting that Ra described either 4th or 5th density beings providing channels as requiring naivety to provide the channel.
So my question is, do we have a role to play in making our knowledge available, or do we wait in silence?
(11-10-2012, 11:57 PM)zenmaster Wrote: I look at it this way - it seems that the culture had created an imbalance - a gaping hole or a vacuum. The new information was intended to "correct" the imbalance, but it instead served to isolate the current system of thought in a non-accepting manner. So the current system was not appreciated enough to integrate with the new system. The rejection resulted in war.
That or wisdom led to feelings of superiority, which created a holy war, as has happened in our past.
(11-11-2012, 12:20 AM)Conifer16 Wrote: In other words presenting someone with the seeds and the fertile dirt to plant in, and then letting them cultivate the seeds in their thoughts and in their experience causing them to really "get" the lesson. :-)
I agree with your entire post..it seems to be the harmonious approach. I'm mostly stumped about the question I propose above.