Abrupt vs gradual harvest

[Parsons]

What will happen to our advanced 2D/chemical vehicles after the shift this December? Will we be inhabiting the appropriate density vehicle for 4D consciousness after that? Will these vehicles be upgraded to accommodate? And what will happen to the physical vehicles for the ones that are going to be repeating 3D?

The physical vehicle which the 3D human consciousness currently inhabits will be transmuted into the vessel which is most appropriately equipped to handle the less denser 4D spectrum of experience.

Sounds like the typical ascension idea, rather than harvest.

I make pretty much no distinction between the terms. i believe that there are numerous 'overbaked' concepts which people are splitting hairs over. Both words are commonly used to describe the transition from 3D to a higher density. It only serves to bog down the intellectual mind with long, heated discussions about separating these two concepts when there is no way to empirically prove your distinction between the terms.

Problem is that this is a rather long process of successive generations birthing "transitional bodies" which newly enter this realm as 4D.

I remember no specific Ra/Q'uo'tes which support this theory.

Further, the "4D spectrum of experience" is more dense, not less dense - and no, that's not a question of semantics.

Again, tamato, tomato, the persecutive differs but the end result is the same. It is very cute that you claim it is not a question of semantics when you are arguing semantics.

"Semantics (from Greek: sēmantiká, neuter plural of sēmantikós) is the study of meaning. It focuses on the relation between signifiers, such as words, phrases, signs, and symbols, and what they stand for, their denotata."