10-25-2012, 09:37 AM
Each mind/body/spirit complex is sovereign of itself, agent of its own free-will, and author of its own life-story.
To recognize and uphold external figures of authority takes that power/free-will away from yourself, diminishing/limiting/restricting your innate ability to exercise that quintessential divine principle: free-will. To lend that free-will to others ("their will be done over mine") empowers the enslaver/master/elite.
POWER is legitimate free-will sovereignty.
This is what the "elite" possess simply because the masses give it away (which results in the "power differential" between master and slave). And it will continue to be like this for as long as people keep electing their "leaders" and putting them on pedestals of grandeur where they may continue to dictate what is expected of them, what rules to adhere to, etc.
If there is one "responsibility," this is it: to take charge of your own sovereignty instead of choosing others to direct your life (and then whine and complain about how "corrupt" and abusive the government is?).
And don't get me wrong, there is quite a big difference between a good shepherd and its sheep (i.e. teacher/student relationship), and a butcher and its sheep (i.e. master/slave relationship). The sheep here—whether conscious of it or not—have become so enslaved out of their own volition by choosing and agreeing to be lorded over by a governmental/authoritarian entity. It was their choice then and it continues to be their choice now. This kind of attitude/behavior is of a 3rd density fear-based mindset with negative imprints based on the hierarchical system of master/slave power relationships of 4th density negative service.
Why is it that people keep thinking that "authority" does not belong to them and is only to be awarded to and recognized on external figures of popularity? This continues to befuddle me to this day.
Do YOU have authority?
Authority (n)
From O.Fr. auctorité "authority, prestige, right, permission, dignity, gravity" (12c.; Mod.Fr. autorité), from L. auctoritatem (nom. auctoritas) "invention, advice, opinion, influence, command," from auctor "master, leader, author"
And by the way, I deal/interact/brush with psychology students somewhat regularly (if I had chosen to follow a professional career, philosophy/psychology/sociology would've been it), and I have often remarked how the psychology of today has very little of "psyche" (Greek for "soul/mind"), and should instead be re-named "brainology" to more accurately reflect its field of study: the brain.
To recognize and uphold external figures of authority takes that power/free-will away from yourself, diminishing/limiting/restricting your innate ability to exercise that quintessential divine principle: free-will. To lend that free-will to others ("their will be done over mine") empowers the enslaver/master/elite.
POWER is legitimate free-will sovereignty.
This is what the "elite" possess simply because the masses give it away (which results in the "power differential" between master and slave). And it will continue to be like this for as long as people keep electing their "leaders" and putting them on pedestals of grandeur where they may continue to dictate what is expected of them, what rules to adhere to, etc.
If there is one "responsibility," this is it: to take charge of your own sovereignty instead of choosing others to direct your life (and then whine and complain about how "corrupt" and abusive the government is?).
And don't get me wrong, there is quite a big difference between a good shepherd and its sheep (i.e. teacher/student relationship), and a butcher and its sheep (i.e. master/slave relationship). The sheep here—whether conscious of it or not—have become so enslaved out of their own volition by choosing and agreeing to be lorded over by a governmental/authoritarian entity. It was their choice then and it continues to be their choice now. This kind of attitude/behavior is of a 3rd density fear-based mindset with negative imprints based on the hierarchical system of master/slave power relationships of 4th density negative service.
Why is it that people keep thinking that "authority" does not belong to them and is only to be awarded to and recognized on external figures of popularity? This continues to befuddle me to this day.
Do YOU have authority?
Authority (n)
From O.Fr. auctorité "authority, prestige, right, permission, dignity, gravity" (12c.; Mod.Fr. autorité), from L. auctoritatem (nom. auctoritas) "invention, advice, opinion, influence, command," from auctor "master, leader, author"
And by the way, I deal/interact/brush with psychology students somewhat regularly (if I had chosen to follow a professional career, philosophy/psychology/sociology would've been it), and I have often remarked how the psychology of today has very little of "psyche" (Greek for "soul/mind"), and should instead be re-named "brainology" to more accurately reflect its field of study: the brain.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)