Why was earth 3D STS?

[flow]

...why was Earth a 3D STS planet?...

it wasn't.

the rest of your question can be answered by reading LOO material.
there are numerous reasons as to why Earth has such a messed up history: dna alterations by Yahweh, mixed origins populations, Mars hostile ancestry, heavy veil chosen by our Sun for our Earth, exploits by Orion Empire, etc.

[unity100]

Ra didnt say Earth was a sts planet. Ra said that the societal system was STS, despite a majority being positive or unaligned. Social system, ie like capitalism.

[canada_dry]

I think the earth leans toward STS because of the ape body. Ra speculates the ape form is used because it increases the thickness of the veil.

[/url]90.12 Questioner: Was there a reason for choosing the forms that have evolved upon this planet and, if so, what was it?

Ra: I am Ra. We are not entirely sure why our Logos and several neighboring Logoi of approximately the same space/time of flowering chose the bipedal, erect form of the second-density apes to invest. It has been our supposition, which we share with you as long as you are aware that this is mere opinion, that our Logos was interested in, shall we say, further intensifying the veiling process by offering to the third-density form the near complete probability for the development of speech taking complete precedence over concept communication or telepathy. We also have the supposition that the so-called opposable thumb was looked upon as an excellent means of intensifying the veiling process so that rather than rediscovering the powers of the mind the third-density entity would, by the form of its physical manifestation, be drawn to the making, holding, and using of physical tools.

The ape body also gives us the warfare we experience.

[url=https://www.lawofone.info/s/90]90.18 Questioner: There seems to have been created by this Logos, to me anyway, a large percentage of entities whose distortion was toward warfare, in that we had the Maldek and the Mars experience and now Earth. It seems that Venus was the exception to what we could almost call the rule of warfare. Is this correct and was this envisioned and planned into the construction of the archetypical mind, possibly not with respect particularly to warfare as we have experienced it but to the extreme action to polarization in consciousness?

Ra: I am Ra. It is correct that the Logos designed Its experiment to attempt to achieve the greatest possible opportunities for polarization in third density. It is incorrect that warfare of the types specific to your experiences was planned by the Logos. This form of expression of hostility is an interesting result which is apparently concomitant with the tool-making ability. The choice of the Logos to use the life-form with the grasping thumb is the decision to which this type of warfare may be traced.

I wonder what kind of animal the Ra civilization was? I think David Wilcock said they were birds, but I don't know why he thinks that. Does anyone know? If they were birds, then that explains why they had an easier time at 3D and a thinner veil. Having to squawk instead of forming sentences meant they would develop concept communication and telepathy more readily. Also, no opposable thumbs, so no complex weapons.

[369Epsilon89/99]

I think the earth leans toward STS because of the ape body. Ra speculates the ape form is used because it increases the thickness of the veil.

[/url]90.12 Questioner: Was there a reason for choosing the forms that have evolved upon this planet and, if so, what was it?

Ra: I am Ra. We are not entirely sure why our Logos and several neighboring Logoi of approximately the same space/time of flowering chose the bipedal, erect form of the second-density apes to invest. It has been our supposition, which we share with you as long as you are aware that this is mere opinion, that our Logos was interested in, shall we say, further intensifying the veiling process by offering to the third-density form the near complete probability for the development of speech taking complete precedence over concept communication or telepathy. We also have the supposition that the so-called opposable thumb was looked upon as an excellent means of intensifying the veiling process so that rather than rediscovering the powers of the mind the third-density entity would, by the form of its physical manifestation, be drawn to the making, holding, and using of physical tools.

The ape body also gives us the warfare we experience.

[url=https://www.lawofone.info/s/90]90.18 Questioner: There seems to have been created by this Logos, to me anyway, a large percentage of entities whose distortion was toward warfare, in that we had the Maldek and the Mars experience and now Earth. It seems that Venus was the exception to what we could almost call the rule of warfare. Is this correct and was this envisioned and planned into the construction of the archetypical mind, possibly not with respect particularly to warfare as we have experienced it but to the extreme action to polarization in consciousness?

Ra: I am Ra. It is correct that the Logos designed Its experiment to attempt to achieve the greatest possible opportunities for polarization in third density. It is incorrect that warfare of the types specific to your experiences was planned by the Logos. This form of expression of hostility is an interesting result which is apparently concomitant with the tool-making ability. The choice of the Logos to use the life-form with the grasping thumb is the decision to which this type of warfare may be traced.

I wonder what kind of animal the Ra civilization was? I think David Wilcock said they were birds, but I don't know why he thinks that. Does anyone know? If they were birds, then that explains why they had an easier time at 3D and a thinner veil. Having to squawk instead of forming sentences meant they would develop concept communication and telepathy more readily. Also, no opposable thumbs, so no complex weapons.

War comes from the concept of duality and separation, not from a specific DNA template such as reptilian or primate. Who is to say that bird based beings would squawk unintelligibly, or that beings without opposable thumbs cannot create complex technology? Not maximizing on the imagination there, my friend. 2d birds already have many complex sounds and vocalizations besides "squawking", just listen to a mocking bird for example. Spoken language would absolutely not be a problem for a bird based species.

Imagine dragons for instance, for a good example of beings without opposable thumbs. Voice, sound, and energy. The sages of old could melt and shape stone with sound and/or touch. Water can be structured by prayer. Thus, one can picture technology and even nanotechnology being shaped by energetic fields and sound waves rather than thumbs.

I hope this helps expand your picture of what is possible in regards to other cultures and how they might live their lives 

[canada_dry]

I think the earth leans toward STS because of the ape body. Ra speculates the ape form is used because it increases the thickness of the veil.

[/url]90.12 Questioner: Was there a reason for choosing the forms that have evolved upon this planet and, if so, what was it?

Ra: I am Ra. We are not entirely sure why our Logos and several neighboring Logoi of approximately the same space/time of flowering chose the bipedal, erect form of the second-density apes to invest. It has been our supposition, which we share with you as long as you are aware that this is mere opinion, that our Logos was interested in, shall we say, further intensifying the veiling process by offering to the third-density form the near complete probability for the development of speech taking complete precedence over concept communication or telepathy. We also have the supposition that the so-called opposable thumb was looked upon as an excellent means of intensifying the veiling process so that rather than rediscovering the powers of the mind the third-density entity would, by the form of its physical manifestation, be drawn to the making, holding, and using of physical tools.

The ape body also gives us the warfare we experience.

[url=https://www.lawofone.info/s/90]90.18 Questioner: There seems to have been created by this Logos, to me anyway, a large percentage of entities whose distortion was toward warfare, in that we had the Maldek and the Mars experience and now Earth. It seems that Venus was the exception to what we could almost call the rule of warfare. Is this correct and was this envisioned and planned into the construction of the archetypical mind, possibly not with respect particularly to warfare as we have experienced it but to the extreme action to polarization in consciousness?

Ra: I am Ra. It is correct that the Logos designed Its experiment to attempt to achieve the greatest possible opportunities for polarization in third density. It is incorrect that warfare of the types specific to your experiences was planned by the Logos. This form of expression of hostility is an interesting result which is apparently concomitant with the tool-making ability. The choice of the Logos to use the life-form with the grasping thumb is the decision to which this type of warfare may be traced.

I wonder what kind of animal the Ra civilization was? I think David Wilcock said they were birds, but I don't know why he thinks that. Does anyone know? If they were birds, then that explains why they had an easier time at 3D and a thinner veil. Having to squawk instead of forming sentences meant they would develop concept communication and telepathy more readily. Also, no opposable thumbs, so no complex weapons.

War comes from the concept of duality and separation, not from a specific DNA template such as reptilian or primate. Who is to say that bird based beings would squawk unintelligibly, or that beings without opposable thumbs cannot create complex technology? Not maximizing on the imagination there, my friend. 2d birds already have many complex sounds and vocalizations besides "squawking", just listen to a mocking bird for example. Spoken language would absolutely not be a problem for a bird based species.

Imagine dragons for instance, for a good example of beings without opposable thumbs. Voice, sound, and energy. The sages of old could melt and shape stone with sound and/or touch. Water can be structured by prayer. Thus, one can picture technology and even nanotechnology being shaped by energetic fields and sound waves rather than thumbs.

I hope this helps expand your picture of what is possible in regards to other cultures and how they might live their lives 

I didn't say war comes from opposable thumbs. I said the war we experience comes from opposable thumbs. Think guns, bombs, planetary anhiliation, etc. Again, "This form of expression of hostility is an interesting result which is apparently concomitant with the tool-making ability. The choice of the Logos to use the life-form with the grasping thumb is the decision to which this type of warfare may be traced."

The tree people Ra referenced had complex technology, but not thumbs, nor mouths. Did they have complex weapons that they used on eachother? I don't think so.

Your point about birds is fair enough. Maybe birds would be inclined to develop speech before telepathy. But maybe not. What about fish? Snakes? Arachnids?

Regarding dragons, are you referencing your time in Skyrim or what?

[flow]

look, we got 3 hostile planets out of 4 in our solar system. Maldek was entirely destroyed, Mars became inhospitable, Earth is difficult, but at least we approached harvest, thanks to all the help. so Earth is neither an exclusive war-like planet, nor it is STS oriented one. it is STS only on the surface, since the planet is run by STS elites, who promote their values of competition,separation,wealth, power, etc., but very few beings actually became STS harvestable. the majority of harvestable entities are STO.

only Venus / Ra made it good. but that was many millions of years ago, since Ra is mere 2 millions years away from their sixth density harvest. they are basically ready to enter seventh density.

[Asolsutsesvyl]

Early in this thread, there's some exploration of the moralistic framework of a "fall" into 3D STS, recognizable both from some modern channeling and of course the Bible. This is tied to moralistic visions of good futures and bad futures, and an almost cartoonish good vs. evil struggle in the world. The more sci-fi extrapolations of how the future may look if you believe the Cassiopaeans are summarized pretty well here.

I have some thoughts on an opposite. It's easy to reconcile the idea that biological life as we know it on Earth (humanity and the rest) is mostly selfish with the idea that people in this world are not very consciously STS. Biological life as we know it is primarily a gory spectacle of life forms eating life forms, but for the most part this is instinctive or hard-wired, thus it's not a conscious orientation. Humanity is growing into consciousness but quite limited in how much of its life is consciously directed; a great deal of life is automatic, biologically driven, the adventures of "meat robots". It's only to the degree that the automatism of biology is grown past that conscious metaphysical polarity can even enter the picture.

Unfortunately, when people try to organize stuff in a more conscious way, in large part it begins oriented around the instinctive drives to hoard resources, avoid losses, etc., and so what builds on a large and collective level can for a long time end up with more negative features than positive. As unity100 mentioned, you see it in how people organize everything around money.

Organic life is limited, so much time and focus is swallowed up by biological needs, and this limits how much consciousness can possibly grow, before a full change of paradigm takes place to something else that people can't currently imagine using the imagination provided by the human brain. I think different forms of life unimaginable by human minds could possibly have much better starting points, ending up with much less messy histories.

Note that whenever people imagine other forms of life in the universe, and especially stories of them interacting with humanity, it ends up imagining something very similar to human dramas -- that's because people use human brains wired for human dynamics to imagine all dynamics. So people imagine human dramas with superficial changes on top of the same old psychology, dressing it up differently a little like space opera actors do. All the stories about exopolitics sound like human tribes or societies interacting with only small changes to it all, and that's how you know that the stories are really human stories, made to fit too-small human imaginations that reduce everything in the universe to human monkey-business (possibly thinly disguised).

But now I'm rambling...

[flofrog]

Unfortunately, when people try to organize stuff in a more conscious way, in large part it begins oriented around the instinctive drives to hoard resources, avoid losses, etc., and so what builds on a large and collective level can for a long time end up with more negative features than positive. As unity. All the stories about exopolitics sound like human tribes or societies interacting with only small changes to it all, and that's how you know that the stories are really human stories, made to fit too-small human imaginations that reduce everything in the universe to human monkey-business (possibly thinly disguised).

But now I'm rambling...

Lol, I like your ramblings Asolsutsesvyl…

Earth being said to be an STS, might be of course a generalization. Here is an interesting read.
A young woman, new mother, Michaeleen Doucleff,  a PHD in science, was a correspondant for NPR, studying global health.
Before the pandemic, she went to a place in Mexico to report on their exceptional immunity. But her interest was picked there, by something else. She was a young mother with a very rebellious toddler girl, and while there, even though that place had wifi, tv, etc… so most things like any other ‘tech countries’, she noticed how peaceful children were, how small children were already doing grownup things, cleaning houses, preparing breakfast, sharing easily things. 

Wanting to understand what she could possibly do differently with her own daughter, she took a semi sabbatical and went back to Mexico, with her toddler under her arm, lol,  but visited also the Inuits, and also the Hazde, a tribe in Africa. Sh then wrote a really remarkable book on how in these three examples, who, she insists, share also present technology, peace, warm relationships, instant sharing, etc… exist.
It’s a very interesting book, and I am sure many more examples exist around Earth…

So we may focus on elites, and dark powers, but there’s also a whole wide range, living amidst these dark vibrations, who embrace other vibrations with some grassroots wisdom, and then…hmmm.. love. Lol

[Dtris]

One thing to keep in mind while discussing the STS vs STO paradigm in societal structures, is the graduation requirements.

51% STO
5% STS

What that means is that life in 3D starts at a baseline of some degree of STS when viewed in those ratios. This is seen in tribalism, warfare, in-group vs out-group, and other behaviors such as resource hoarding and automatic behaviors as mentioned.

This is one of the aspects of humanity that so many people today have trouble reconciling. How can people did horrible things be a hero to some? How can a person be a murderer and a savior? A leader and a despot?

The answer lies in where we start this journey and the way we view the world. Family is the original in-group, and we still see people worldwide who are loyal to family, even when that family does horrible things, over outsiders. You see groups who shun outside or institutional justice and prefer local in in-group justice.

Whether you are in-group or out-group has historically been a major determinant in how you were treated. Someone may be kind, giving, charitable, and regarded as a good person by their family, or country, or race, and at the same time do horrible things to people in the out-group, justified by protecting their in-group.

This is why the present day polarization is so harmful and many people are trying to stop it, unfortunately many efforts to do so get pigeonholed into the in or out group ideology.

What we see in history and present day behavior as STS, is often a larger representation of the in-group vs out-group bias, while STO behavior is largely reserved for in-group members, and depending on your own perspective can even appear to be STS oriented.

Despite this, according to Ra, we are going to have a larger portion of STO graduates at this end of cycle than STS. The disparity in this and the perception of STS social environment is at least partially due to the starting point being STS skewed, and the fact that the largest portion of people will be repeating the cycle in high likelihood.

[jafar]

The answer lies in where we start this journey and the way we view the world. Family is the original in-group, and we still see people worldwide who are loyal to family, even when that family does horrible things, over outsiders. You see groups who shun outside or institutional justice and prefer local in in-group justice.

Whether you are in-group or out-group has historically been a major determinant in how you were treated. Someone may be kind, giving, charitable, and regarded as a good person by their family, or country, or race, and at the same time do horrible things to people in the out-group, justified by protecting their in-group.

This is why the present day polarization is so harmful and many people are trying to stop it, unfortunately many efforts to do so get pigeonholed into the in or out group ideology.

"Just look at the atrocities that we did in the last century, all of it was caused by limited identification."
-- Sadhguru

Mind | Prejudice and Identity 
https://youtu.be/b6yjd1VicmQ




Limited identification is a pre-requisite to be STS.
Once it's getting broaden and broaden one will start it's progress of transforming towards STO.

Another good talk about the issue..

Limited identity is bad for you Just broaden your identity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViVLvDNEc1o