Meeting yourself in this life

[buket]

Like I said, you're not wrong. It is just more appropriate.

Don't get me wrong. I don't defend the word 'yourself'. I think it is wrong because we consist of mind body and spirit. Not only spirit.

Don't you think it is wrong, too?

I don't think it's wrong, infinity is one and cannot be anything else.

However I do think that such an approach can be used for manipulation of weak minds. I.e "You're me and now you're my slave."

But it's not wrong, because it is a catalyst for growth for those who need such strong lessons of oneness.

Healing works in mysterious ways, nothing is wrong, all is the creator/creation.

We are all the creator but we are unique as entities and a soul share does not make eachother the same being. Don't you think so?

[ada]

I agree with you.

In my opinion when earth becomes 4d, all 3d entities who are harvested here to the STO planet become one soul / social memory complex.

[Glow]

Is it correct to call another person yourself if only spirit is the thing you share?

Other-self would be more appropriate. But it's not like you're wrong.. The one is one, we're fragments of one but also contain the whole within us.

Yes but Q'uo accepts the word 'yourself' in the question. Is Q'uo wrong?

I think the point is in actually seeing the other self as you. The recognition takes it from theoretical we are all one to something that isn’t just an idea. It shakes loose some ego that says I am this thing(body)/these thoughts(mind) and makes you see no I am what is in this body and that body. So I am not this.

It also weakens that need for little i will as, if I am what is in each of us it’s not my will that matters but our combined will.

Personally it has made me better able to extrapolate that to all parts of self. Losing ego to that extent is a step back to unity. Baby step by baby step we all will know each self as ourselves.

[buket]

Is it correct to call another person yourself if only spirit is the thing you share?

Other-self would be more appropriate. But it's not like you're wrong.. The one is one, we're fragments of one but also contain the whole within us.

Yes but Q'uo accepts the word 'yourself' in the question. Is Q'uo wrong?

I think the point is in actually seeing the other self as you. The recognition takes it from theoretical we are all one to something that isn’t just an idea. It shakes loose some ego that says I am this thing(body)/these thoughts(mind) and makes you see no I am what is in this body and that body. So I am not this.

It also weakens that need for little i will as, if I am what is in each of us it’s not my will that matters but our combined will.

Personally it has made me better able to extrapolate that to all parts of self. Losing ego to that extent is a step back to unity. Baby step by baby step we all will know each self as ourselves.

RA says that each mind body spirit complex is unique. I think it is hard for us to say we are eachother in this density.

[ada]

Is it correct to call another person yourself if only spirit is the thing you share?

Other-self would be more appropriate. But it's not like you're wrong.. The one is one, we're fragments of one but also contain the whole within us.

Yes but Q'uo accepts the word 'yourself' in the question. Is Q'uo wrong?

I think the point is in actually seeing the other self as you. The recognition takes it from theoretical we are all one to something that isn’t just an idea. It shakes loose some ego that says I am this thing(body)/these thoughts(mind) and makes you see no I am what is in this body and that body. So I am not this.

It also weakens that need for little i will as, if I am what is in each of us it’s not my will that matters but our combined will.

Personally it has made me better able to extrapolate that to all parts of self. Losing ego to that extent is a step back to unity. Baby step by baby step we all will know each self as ourselves.

RA says that each mind body spirit complex is unique. I think it is hard for us to say we are eachother in this density.

Each and their path, progress, and belief.

After the first few distortions all other distortions are one to one.

Free will is something cloaked in mystery of love.

[Glow]

Is it correct to call another person yourself if only spirit is the thing you share?

Other-self would be more appropriate. But it's not like you're wrong.. The one is one, we're fragments of one but also contain the whole within us.

Yes but Q'uo accepts the word 'yourself' in the question. Is Q'uo wrong?

I think the point is in actually seeing the other self as you. The recognition takes it from theoretical we are all one to something that isn’t just an idea. It shakes loose some ego that says I am this thing(body)/these thoughts(mind) and makes you see no I am what is in this body and that body. So I am not this.

It also weakens that need for little i will as, if I am what is in each of us it’s not my will that matters but our combined will.

Personally it has made me better able to extrapolate that to all parts of self. Losing ego to that extent is a step back to unity. Baby step by baby step we all will know each self as ourselves.

RA says that each mind body spirit complex is unique. I think it is hard for us to say we are eachother in this density.

I didn't understand why this was being tripped over till this post but I guess it is a matter of how you are to experience things in this life. My perspective in this life is to see how nothing is one thing.

Fate and free will are two sides of a coin.
You can be you and all things at once. You do not lose one to be the other it is just your experience on a spectrum that determines what you call something.

Is your body energy or matter? Are you in ohio, or the united states? Are you human or mammal, or earthling, or resident of the milky way, or are you the milky way? No perspective is better it's just how close you look.

[Glow]

Found something super weird today and am needing to share it somewhere.
I just opened my computer brought up bring4th, and the biorhythm page was suggested so I thought why not.

*Back story an alternate incarnation and I have our adeptness cycle syncronized and I was pretty shocked at that but what ever.
*Second back story this morning my husband said he felt sort of out of the body today. He is very grounded so I was curious if he was at 99% adeptness and just connected elsewhere... he is 2 days off from 99% so it's coming but that isn't really the point.

Here is the weird. It was pre inputted to my other incarnations wife's birthday. I may have checked that a long time ago when I thought she was channeling her soul well but I have looked at the biorhythm since then so its odd hers was what was pre filled.
Never turning down a suggested weird from the universe I clicked submit to see where she is and she is exactly synced up with my husbands adeptness cycle. I know they are not parallels but it's just one of those weird signs from the universe this whole THING was carefully planned down to the strangest details.

Thanks for letting me share.

[buket]

If we are eachother why do we have different minds and bodies? We are one in the sense that we are all love. But we do have different minds and bodies. We are unique portions of the creator says Ra

[buket]

Do parallel incarnations resemble twin flames?