08-05-2013, 04:35 PM
When we attribute issues to one energy center, is that a bit of reductionism going on? For example we attribute certain characteristics to one energy center and it may be a useful way of understanding one's issues. Yet when we are faced with certain catalyst, this catalyst may have connections with blockages in multiple and/or all centers... kind of like a one problem that may be understood on various different levels.
For example, when there is catalyst around the issue of abandonment and rejection in personal relationships, there may also be social experiences around being oppressed or repressed... That then may make it a challenge to open our hearts to friends and loved ones, as well to our society or larger groups or universal family. Perhaps a sense of unworthiness to serve the creator.. and so on. The primary issue may be the orange ray (for example) and so it makes sense to focus on that center. I guess I'm wondering if focusing on just one center could possibly shift other centers but then working on different levels, simultaneously, could also shift self on a broader level.
My question is, according to Ra's teachings, how may problems be conceptualized?
According to the conceptualization of the problem, how may we proceed with working through catalyst (e.g., focus on the 'core' issue and associated centers, focus on all centers).
In past discussion I understand there was mention of working with all centers as optimal way. That kind of makes more sense to me.
For example, when there is catalyst around the issue of abandonment and rejection in personal relationships, there may also be social experiences around being oppressed or repressed... That then may make it a challenge to open our hearts to friends and loved ones, as well to our society or larger groups or universal family. Perhaps a sense of unworthiness to serve the creator.. and so on. The primary issue may be the orange ray (for example) and so it makes sense to focus on that center. I guess I'm wondering if focusing on just one center could possibly shift other centers but then working on different levels, simultaneously, could also shift self on a broader level.
My question is, according to Ra's teachings, how may problems be conceptualized?
According to the conceptualization of the problem, how may we proceed with working through catalyst (e.g., focus on the 'core' issue and associated centers, focus on all centers).
In past discussion I understand there was mention of working with all centers as optimal way. That kind of makes more sense to me.