05-23-2013, 11:31 AM
(05-23-2013, 10:44 AM)ChickenInSpace Wrote: Consider the possibility of a child wanting to be in service and knowingly enter such an act. This would from the childs perspective be STO. Depending on the receptor of such an attitude the whole thing can be within STO framework.
Ah, I see. Never saw it through this perspective before. The pedophile desires an experience, and the child accepts. But there are many variables in that case to guarantee free will, too. The child may not be mature enough to be aware of the consequences of the action s/he agrees to. The pedophile may be deceiving the child instead of being forward and honest about his intentions.
Anyway, I am under the impression that the guy in subject here has the thought that he doesn't care about the consequences of his action to his victims. He needs to be made aware of those consequences first. And then he will need support for expressing his desires, acceptance for them, and the willingness of others to help him find a healthy outlet/unblock for said desires that all parties involved deem appropriate, as a member of society and not as a cancer in need to be cut out and isolated. Which, sadly, seems to be the majority view regarding the issue both in our systems and here on this thread (mine included just minutes ago).