01-05-2013, 08:20 AM
I always forget that "on-going" part.
As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.
You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022)
x
01-05-2013, 08:20 AM
I always forget that "on-going" part.
01-05-2013, 10:07 AM
01-05-2013, 10:22 AM
Please read session 68 and then, if you still have questions, please ask.
(01-05-2013, 08:15 AM)ShinAr Wrote:(01-05-2013, 08:09 AM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Shin'Ar, you might want to read the Law of One sessions. That quote is referring to a pretty fundamental part of the whole saga. That explains a lot. The purpose of this forum is to help one another study and apply the Law of One. It wasn't intended to be a lab where anyone can just come in and start psycho-analyzing our community members.
01-05-2013, 12:11 PM
(01-05-2013, 12:11 PM)Turtle Wrote:(01-05-2013, 11:51 AM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: The purpose of this forum is to help one another study and apply the Law of One. It wasn't intended to be a lab where anyone can just come in and start psycho-analyzing our community members. Really? That's interesting. If anyone was focused on study of the material, it was unity100. Oh, are you saying my statement "the purpose is to study the Law of One" reminds you of him? because that is somehow limiting interactions? To clarify: I'm not saying we shouldn't have personal interactions. That is how we apply Law of One principles, by loving, accepting, and learning from one another. But there's a difference between personal interactions along the path of Law of One study, and being more interested in psycho-analyzing others than in studying the material.
01-05-2013, 12:43 PM
Please don't hijack the term 'psychoanalyzing'... it's a technical and context-specific thing.
01-05-2013, 01:30 PM
01-05-2013, 01:43 PM
Assumptions, biases, hypothesizing, challenging, honesty etc. Depends on where someone is coming from and how they got to that particular understanding of other self, maybe.
01-05-2013, 02:09 PM
(12-31-2012, 08:06 PM)Bring4th_Aaron Wrote: Shin'Ar, from where did you get the idea that Pickle doesn't wish to leave the physical existence? And why does it become a lens through which to interpret everything he says? This is an example of how I came to the impression that Pickle does not wish to leave the physical existence. Quote Pickle "I am addicted to being a Human. I love it! Screw becoming a light being, I am happy with being me! I want to continue experiencing the illusion through my bag of bones. That also means I will take measures to ensure this bag does not deteriorate too soon lol"UNQUOTE Not that it matters to me, it is his choice, I just simply hoped to discuss it with him. Not sure what the big deal is all about. as a matter of fact I am very uncomfortable to continue posting this quote of his. It makes it seem as though I am using it against him which I am not. This is what he had to say, I assume what he actually thinks, and I took his word for the way it was offered to me as his philosophy. The only reason I am posting it here and there in response to these foolish posts is because he has not spoken in my defense to tell all of you meddlers that he did give me that impression in our discussions. I would certainly have done the same for him rather than sit back and watch all of these uncalled for accusations and foolish interjections. No insult was ever meant nor anything said that should have even been taken as such. I spoke to him about our past interactions and hopped that we could discuss this topic further.
01-05-2013, 03:35 PM
(01-05-2013, 12:43 PM)rie Wrote: Please don't hijack the term 'psychoanalyzing'... it's a technical and context-specific thing.Psychoanalysis is also a type of therapy. But in general, terms do tend to be hijacked because they exist merely as unidentified, whimsical abstract notions to which pre-rational, vague ideas may then 'resonate' due to free association of the unconscious. The false associations can also be the result of simple misinterpretations or misunderstandings (as people tend to be lazy). Quantum Mechanics is a common one: http://ethicalnag.org/2011/02/24/quantum...ttraction/
01-05-2013, 05:14 PM
'harvest' and 'ascension'...
(01-05-2013, 02:09 PM)ShinAr Wrote:(12-31-2012, 08:06 PM)Bring4th_Aaron Wrote: Shin'Ar, from where did you get the idea that Pickle doesn't wish to leave the physical existence? And why does it become a lens through which to interpret everything he says? Well, I can say based on my impression of you that I completely understand why this quote of Pickle's brings you catalyst. But the question is WHY does it bring you catalyst? I can think I know based on my impression, but I want to hear from YOU why Pickle saying that makes you have the reaction you do. I know that you want to discuss it with Pickle directly, and that people are sharing their own thoughts about the situation, but Pickle doesn't seem very eager to have bare-bones discussion with you about this. The reason why I asked you the second question was that it seemed to me that no matter what Pickle said after that point, you would make posts that rebuke him based on who you think him to be, instead of interpreting his posts on their own merit. This issue is probably about the free will of incarnate entities behind the veil, and about disconnection/unawareness of "the divine process" as you call that awareness of the soul's upward movement through the densities. If a third density physically incarnate entity feels like they never want to experience anything more than continued incarnations in the physical, whether or not that is to be of continued service, then it seems to me that you interpret that mode of thinking as a grave mis-step, as a dangerous mistake, or perhaps foolish unawareness. (If I'm wrong about any of this, you can totally clarify.) And that makes you want to address Pickle in order to make him aware of this folly. You want to share your knowledge and understanding with him, in order to make him aware that there is a "wiser" choice. But the way that you go about this sharing is quite roughly received by those who are responding to you in the way that you state above. I know that Pickle has his own wisdom and his own way of seeking the path to the Creator. I feel that this should be respected as a valid choice of the matter of experiencing the one Creator. All is acceptable in its own place and time.
01-05-2013, 10:21 PM
(01-05-2013, 08:47 PM)Bring4th_Aaron Wrote: This issue is probably about the free will of incarnate entities behind the veil, and about disconnection/unawareness of "the divine process" as you call that awareness of the soul's upward movement through the densities. If a third density physically incarnate entity feels like they never want to experience anything more than continued incarnations in the physical, whether or not that is to be of continued service, then it seems to me that you interpret that mode of thinking as a grave mis-step, as a dangerous mistake, or perhaps foolish unawareness. How would we "create heaven on earth" if all we concentrated on was leaving? My focus is more towards manifesting spirit into the material plane. Which comes after awareness. I came here for a reason, which happens to deal with living in the physical. I am an optimist which is important in the healing arts. I find that physical "hardships" are much easier to deal with from a joyous/foolish/optimistic perspective. We tend to get stuck in modes of perception within 3D. Yet, on the other side of the veil everything is going according to plan. Even if some get lost along the way, never are they permanently lost. Shin'Ar, quite some time ago I mentioned that you had forgotten who you are. This is still the case. You are quite an advanced Soul, yet you are still stuck in the belief of who you are. I respect your beliefs as your own perspective, and have no wish to change them as I find them harmless. I follow the will of my own Higher Self, along with guidance from my contracted Guides. That is understanding enough for my own personality construct to fulfill its purpose.
01-05-2013, 10:36 PM
01-06-2013, 06:56 AM
(01-05-2013, 10:21 PM)Pickle Wrote:(01-05-2013, 08:47 PM)Bring4th_Aaron Wrote: This issue is probably about the free will of incarnate entities behind the veil, and about disconnection/unawareness of "the divine process" as you call that awareness of the soul's upward movement through the densities. If a third density physically incarnate entity feels like they never want to experience anything more than continued incarnations in the physical, whether or not that is to be of continued service, then it seems to me that you interpret that mode of thinking as a grave mis-step, as a dangerous mistake, or perhaps foolish unawareness. Thank you for your further clarifications Pickle. I would like to discuss that with you in greater detail but for some reason Aaron and Monica have gotten the idea that you do not want to have that discussion with me so I am bowing out. I have no idea where they got that impression unless thyey are speaking with you in PM, which of course I cannot read. But I will take their word for it that you are unwilling or have at some point unknown to me asked that I refrain from the discussion with you. And I most certainly have no issue with you or your understandings as Aaron seems to think. Yes I have my own understandings, as does everyone, but that does not mean that because my understandings contradict with yours that I take issue with you. I do not take issue with anyone else who has thoughts different than mine, so why would I you. It seems that our friends have received information from you that I was not privy to, and they assumed that I was aware of your unwillingness to relate with me. And they added a whole lot of other issues on top of that because of my desire to stand up for myself in that there was never any insult or offense made. Maybe now this can be put to rest. I will certainly not attempt to ask you about your thoughts on this matter again. Sorry to have been such a bother. |
|