On Appealling to Infinities

[Fastidious Emanations]

13.5 Questioner: Thank you. Can you tell me of the earliest, first known thing in the creation?

Ra: I am Ra. The first known thing in the creation is infinity. The infinity is creation.

16.38 Questioner: And then the Law of One is truly universal in creating the progression toward the eighth density or octave in all galaxies. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. There are infinite forms, infinite understandings, but the progression is one.

18.1 Questioner: I was thinking last night that if I were in the place of Ra at this time, the first distortion of the Law of One might cause me to mix some erroneous data with the true information that I was transmitting to this group. Do you do this?

Ra: I am Ra. We do not intentionally do this. However, there will be confusion. The errors which have occurred have occurred due to the occasional variation in the vibrational complex of this instrument due to its ingestion of a chemical substance. It is not our intent in this particular project to create erroneous information but to express in the confining ambiance of your language system the feeling of the infinite mystery of the one creation in its infinite and intelligent unity.

13.12 Questioner: Could you tell me how intelligent infinity became, shall we say (I’m having difficulty with some of the language), how intelligent infinity became individualized from itself?

Ra: I am Ra. This is an appropriate question.

The intelligent infinity discerned a concept. This concept was discerned due to freedom of will of awareness. This concept was finity. This was the first and primal paradox or distortion of the Law of One. Thus the one intelligent infinity invested itself in an exploration of many-ness. Due to the infinite possibilities of intelligent infinity there is no ending to many-ness. The exploration, thus, is free to continue infinitely in an eternal present.

[Spaced]

What is your point exactly?

[AnthroHeart]

I wonder the actual mechanics of what caused infinity to become intelligent and aware. The how of such.

[Plenum]

The Song of Unity as sung by Ra

Don Sings:
"27.5 Questioner: It is not necessary to divide it. The definition of intelligent infinity as one part is sufficient. Could you please now define intelligent infinity?

Ra Sings:
Ra: I am Ra. This is exponentially simpler and less confusing.

(stanza 1)
There is unity.
This unity is all that there is.

(stanza 2)
This unity has a potential and kinetic.

(stanza 3)
The potential is intelligent infinity. Tapping this potential will yield work. This work has been called by us, intelligent energy.

(stanza 4)
The nature of this work is dependent upon the particular distortion of free will which in turn is the nature of a particular intelligent energy or kinetic focus of the potential of unity or that which is all."

end song

- -

[Fastidious Emanations]

What is your point exactly?

Yes, thanks for asking.
The point is that I find the observation of infinity(ies) is/isn't 'not useful for learning' (forgive me if I paraphrase wrongly)/(no forgiveness necessary)..

Thanks Plenum, Ra, etc..

[Spaced]

[Plenum]

you need to go 'super saiyan' mode to appreciate the subtleties being conveyed in this thread.

I am not so subtle at the best of times, but can be more than subtle when the situation calls for it.

subtle/plenum

[zenmaster]

It's one of the phrases I made up to refer to the more obvious avoidance here. Ra was not appealing to infinities, but rather attempting to relate some principles the context of the questioning.

The avoidance kinda stands out when it's repeatedly invoked in association with the topic, as if to be a handwaving reminder of the background of our experience. Typically, in avoidance form, it is provided on its own, unelucidated, s a numinous "answer" to reconcile perceived thought descrepancy or limitations.

In other words, the idea of infinity is appealed to when reaching for intuitive suggestion via free association, rather than the enobling "chop wood, carry water" practical learning experience.

There are also ideas which provide emotional charge due to being unconsciously associated with infinity (I.e. infinite possibilities, perpetual mystery, free energy, transcendence of limits). This idea coveting, also rampant in the meme, is yet another form of bypassing due to appeal to infinities.

[isis]

An appeal to infinities is typically the unconscious suggestion provided by new time/space awareness (both the relative and the absolute are provided with another context) - it's a form of insight which is revelatory and so may carry a lot of weight.

[Fastidious Emanations]

Thanks zm
by the way though in a very subtle and aware balancing act don't we seek everything?

---

Plenum, is that song in the transcripts?
Is there an audio available for this?
peace

[Plenum]

Plenum, is that song in the transcripts?
Is there an audio available for this?

no, that was just my creative editing at play

the actual passage is here, in plain formatting: http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=27#5

as for hearing it, the lawofone.info site has broken down the session audio into individual Q&A's for some sessions, but that particular session (27) has not received that treatment yet.

[zenmaster]

Thanks zm
by the way though in a very subtle and aware balancing act don't we seek everything?

Yes, particularly the personal catalyst which is compelling due to its unconscious suggestion of balance. Catalyst must be circumstantially processed. A circumstance, which is used to create experience, is a consideration in which everything is not held in conscious awareness.
There is no balancing without experience.

[Ankh]

13.5 Questioner: Thank you. Can you tell me of the earliest, first known thing in the creation?

Ra: I am Ra. The first known thing in the creation is infinity. The infinity is creation.

16.38 Questioner: And then the Law of One is truly universal in creating the progression toward the eighth density or octave in all galaxies. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. There are infinite forms, infinite understandings, but the progression is one.

18.1 Questioner: I was thinking last night that if I were in the place of Ra at this time, the first distortion of the Law of One might cause me to mix some erroneous data with the true information that I was transmitting to this group. Do you do this?

Ra: I am Ra. We do not intentionally do this. However, there will be confusion. The errors which have occurred have occurred due to the occasional variation in the vibrational complex of this instrument due to its ingestion of a chemical substance. It is not our intent in this particular project to create erroneous information but to express in the confining ambiance of your language system the feeling of the infinite mystery of the one creation in its infinite and intelligent unity.

13.12 Questioner: Could you tell me how intelligent infinity became, shall we say (I’m having difficulty with some of the language), how intelligent infinity became individualized from itself?

Ra: I am Ra. This is an appropriate question.

The intelligent infinity discerned a concept. This concept was discerned due to freedom of will of awareness. This concept was finity. This was the first and primal paradox or distortion of the Law of One. Thus the one intelligent infinity invested itself in an exploration of many-ness. Due to the infinite possibilities of intelligent infinity there is no ending to many-ness. The exploration, thus, is free to continue infinitely in an eternal present.

Thank you, dear one! All those quotes, gathered together like that, bring such a light into my heart!

[AnthroHeart]

Are we infinite in our free will? Can we really do ANYTHING?

[Fastidious Emanations]

Are we infinite in our free will? Can we really do ANYTHING?

Is this avoidable? Are we not always doing ANYTHING?

[Fang]

I like how it became somewhat of an official term here lawl