threat of large quake on horizon

[Oceania]

didn't Ra say that?

[3DMonkey]

so you are treating prediction of a large quake in a fault zone, after many or prominent volcanoes in that zone have activated, or after similar strong geological pointers, as some worthless vague prediction.

It's irresponsible to create open ended predictions of large earthquakes, especially if you have no business whatsoever doing it.

teeter-totter

I'm irresponsible for predicting, I'm irresponsible for buying your prediction, teeter-totter

I like data. Give me data, and I'll wait to see what more data comes to fill it in.

---

didn't Ra say that?

Could you elaborate, please?


Ra did mention inconveniences that "will cause your planetary sphere to have some ruptures in its outer garment" during transition into fourth density. http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?sea...&ss=1&sc=1

According to 6:17, we are at the approximate end of the "unabated" inconveniences time frame. The opposite of unabated, is become less intense. More synonyms: die down/away/out, lessen, ease (off), let up,decrease, diminish, moderate, decline, fade, dwindle, recede, tail off,peter out, taper off, wane, ebb, weaken, come to an end;.

[Oceania]

Ra said something about earthquakes ending at 2012.

[Monica]

It's irresponsible to create open ended predictions of large earthquakes, especially if you have no business whatsoever doing it.

Recognizing that some zones are more prone to earthquakes isn't an 'open-ended prediction.' Even mainstream geologists don't say "if" an earthquake will occur in some hot zones like California, but "when" it will happen. They say it's long overdue. That's isn't irresponsible; that's just analyzing data.

It would be irresponsible to not report the data analysis, just as it would be irresponsible to not tell residents that a hurricane is on the way.

[zenmaster]

It's irresponsible to create open ended predictions of large earthquakes, especially if you have no business whatsoever doing it.

Recognizing that some zones are more prone to earthquakes isn't an 'open-ended prediction.'

That true, and also obvious. I was referring to "threat of a large quake on the horizon". Yes, it's irresponsible to create open-ended predictions like that.

[βαθμιαίος]

92.33 Questioner: The protection here seems to be depicted as being on the right-hand side but not the left. Would this indicate that there is protection for the positive path but not for the negative?
Ra: I am Ra. You perceive correctly an inborn bias offering to the seeing eye and listing ear information concerning the choice of the more efficient polarity.

94.18 Questioner: It would seem to me, from the configuration of this male entity in Card Number Four, who looks to the left with the right foot pointed to the left, that this card would indicate you must be in a defensive position with respect to the left-hand path, but there is no need to concern yourself about protection with respect to the right-hand path. Would Ra comment on that?
Ra: I am Ra. Again, this is not the suggestion we wished to offer by constructing this image. However, the perception cannot be said to be incorrect.

Category: Tarot: Experience of the Mind

95.26 Questioner: Am I to understand, then, that there is no protection at all if the Experience of the Mind has chosen the left-hand path and that path is traveled? All random catalyst may affect the negatively polarized individual as a function of the statistical nature of the random catalyst. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. You may note some of those of your peoples which, at this space/time nexus, seek places of survival. This is due to the lack of protection when service to self is invoked.

The protection isn't so much from physical catalyst as it is from negative interpretations of that catalyst:

95.24 Questioner: From that statement I interpret the following. If the Experience of the Mind has sufficiently chosen the right-hand path, and as total purity is approached in the choosing of the right-hand path, then total imperviousness from the effect of the left-hand catalyst is also approached. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is exquisitely perceptive. The seeker which has purely chosen the service-to-others path shall certainly not have a variant apparent incarnational experience. There is no outward shelter in your illusion from the gusts, flurries, and blizzards of quick and cruel catalyst.

However, to the pure, all that is encountered speaks of the love and the light of the One Infinite Creator. The cruelest blow is seen with an ambiance of challenges offered and opportunities to come. Thusly, the great pitch of light is held high above such an one so that all interpretation may be seen to be protected by light.

[unity100]

It's irresponsible to create open ended predictions of large earthquakes, especially if you have no business whatsoever doing it.

Recognizing that some zones are more prone to earthquakes isn't an 'open-ended prediction.'

That true, and also obvious. I was referring to "threat of a large quake on the horizon". Yes, it's irresponsible to create open-ended predictions like that.

yes, the threat of a large quake is on the horizon in many parts of the world, and probably 80% of those places are doing nothing.

japanese were preparing. they still got over a 9 scale quake and a tsnami well.

there are 2-4 parts of the world which is in for a megaquake at any given time, yet, noone is doing anything.

there comes the value of 'open ended predictions'. they may cause people to prepare.

[3DMonkey]

"noone is doing anything"
"doing nothing"

that's more depressing than reading a threat of a quake.

[Oceania]

*hugs* try not to get depressed!

[Bring4th_Steve]

I agree with Zen in that those who declare that the next big one is due to hit sometime soon, due to scientific observation/speculation, is a bit "fear mongerish".

I happen to be of the mind-set that I'll be where I have agreed to be, per my pre-incarnational agreement. If I am to be a part of the harvest/ascension, then I really do not need to worry about when or where the next big one is going to hit.

Also, I would not rely on "when" earthquakes are going to end. We have no concrete evidence as to when 4th density is going to finish coming into existence. Or, to phrase it another way, we do not know when 3rd density is going to phase out completely. According to the LOO books, it could be a 300 year period, with quake activity becoming less and less intense as the denser energies are shed and replaced with higher vibrating energies of 4th density.

Wouldn't you rather just trust in yourself, and instead of worrying, just intend for yourself to be safe and protected from any subsequent planetary changes, in whatever form they come in?

[Raman]

This is a mixed harvest.