03-15-2022, 12:26 PM
Cause and Effect – The One Creator and Science
Many people have written doctoral thesis in this area. The total content and depth can be voluminous. Our goal here is to touch the surface, which when explained leaves science in a tough spot.
The process of science, and nearly all scientist admit this, is to explain the observation of an “effect”. The underlying “cause” is outside of the theory proposed, since they don’t know the cause. This is not to say that scientific discoveries haven’t changed all of our lives for the better. But when an explanation for an effect is theorized, the conclusion of the theory is, “these observations are applicable within the bounds delineated by the theory”. In other words, the theory has limits and only applies within a range of use or observation. Why?
Example #1: a theory applied to sub-atomic particles, does not apply to the galactic structure. So the conclusion of each theory, although similar, is to “limit” its application to the particular observation.
Example #2: a new theory employs the underlying concept of gravity. It is the basis upon which many theories are founded. But gravity in and of itself is still an unexplained phenomenon at its root.
Science which controls our schools, industry and culture, continues to search for the one unifying principle or “cause” that joins and explains all “effects” regardless of how or where they are observed or applied. The scientist intuitively knows that all must inevitably be joined as one. Nowhere in a theory will you ever find a statement like, “beyond our ability to observe or understand there is one unifying occurrence that we have not observed and cannot yet explain.”
Some of our most brilliant scientist such as Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman, Isaac Newton, Nikola Tesla – will say just that apart from the published theory. These scientist are in the same trap as past scientist (Aristotle - earth is not flat, Galileo - earth not center of the universe, etc.) who were ridiculed and shamed. For some past scientist the result was a declaration of heresy closely followed by death.
There are modern scientist (Walter Russell, Dewey Larson and others) that have foregone the path of deducing theory from observable effects and simply accepted that there are things we cannot observe or may never be able to observe within this physical illusion. These scientist used inductive reasoning to develop theories that create unity for all that is observed or “known” as this time. Some are bold enough to openly say, that this is the operating principle upon which the universe was created and that the definition of that unifying principle is light, the very essence of creation by the One Creator.
The key principle of cause and effect has been covered to highlight the incredible detail that now exist in this area. For those of you that find this fascinating, it is another “thread you can pull in seeking”, which is how I personally describe my process of seeking. I believe that relentless seeking, when guided by divine inspiration, will lead you to the threads you personally need to pull. Unravel the garment, not to disrobe others, but to shed light on that which inspirits you.
(to be continued - NEXT: Implications of Oneness and the Law of Free Will)
Many people have written doctoral thesis in this area. The total content and depth can be voluminous. Our goal here is to touch the surface, which when explained leaves science in a tough spot.
The process of science, and nearly all scientist admit this, is to explain the observation of an “effect”. The underlying “cause” is outside of the theory proposed, since they don’t know the cause. This is not to say that scientific discoveries haven’t changed all of our lives for the better. But when an explanation for an effect is theorized, the conclusion of the theory is, “these observations are applicable within the bounds delineated by the theory”. In other words, the theory has limits and only applies within a range of use or observation. Why?
Example #1: a theory applied to sub-atomic particles, does not apply to the galactic structure. So the conclusion of each theory, although similar, is to “limit” its application to the particular observation.
Example #2: a new theory employs the underlying concept of gravity. It is the basis upon which many theories are founded. But gravity in and of itself is still an unexplained phenomenon at its root.
Science which controls our schools, industry and culture, continues to search for the one unifying principle or “cause” that joins and explains all “effects” regardless of how or where they are observed or applied. The scientist intuitively knows that all must inevitably be joined as one. Nowhere in a theory will you ever find a statement like, “beyond our ability to observe or understand there is one unifying occurrence that we have not observed and cannot yet explain.”
Some of our most brilliant scientist such as Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman, Isaac Newton, Nikola Tesla – will say just that apart from the published theory. These scientist are in the same trap as past scientist (Aristotle - earth is not flat, Galileo - earth not center of the universe, etc.) who were ridiculed and shamed. For some past scientist the result was a declaration of heresy closely followed by death.
There are modern scientist (Walter Russell, Dewey Larson and others) that have foregone the path of deducing theory from observable effects and simply accepted that there are things we cannot observe or may never be able to observe within this physical illusion. These scientist used inductive reasoning to develop theories that create unity for all that is observed or “known” as this time. Some are bold enough to openly say, that this is the operating principle upon which the universe was created and that the definition of that unifying principle is light, the very essence of creation by the One Creator.
The key principle of cause and effect has been covered to highlight the incredible detail that now exist in this area. For those of you that find this fascinating, it is another “thread you can pull in seeking”, which is how I personally describe my process of seeking. I believe that relentless seeking, when guided by divine inspiration, will lead you to the threads you personally need to pull. Unravel the garment, not to disrobe others, but to shed light on that which inspirits you.
(to be continued - NEXT: Implications of Oneness and the Law of Free Will)