07-19-2012, 05:40 PM
In Ra's terms how would the LOA be described. I know this is a broad question but the like attracts like definition from Ra?
As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.
You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022)
x
07-19-2012, 05:40 PM
In Ra's terms how would the LOA be described. I know this is a broad question but the like attracts like definition from Ra?
07-19-2012, 05:53 PM
I only recall Ra speaking of catalyst - as in, events occur because they are part of a learning plan. Thoughts and intentions increase the likelihood of the event to play out in 3rd, but there are many factors.
Aaron's channelings have much more insight on this topic. I recommend them. The trouble with the law of attraction is, 'You created this, you're to blame.' Also, it suggests that intention alone can move mountains - or so some teach. (Eh* Ehem** Tonyrobbins* Cough*) Many books about the law of attraction are simply hyper-condensed, generalized information gleaned from much (much) more substantial spiritual works. True learning and change is found from the self - Personally, I remember that when I explored the L of A philosophy, I looked to external events to validate that the law of attraction worked, which made me feel even more deflated. Much more productive is, finding a quiet place within the self, and a solid path to walk and help others along on. And take baby steps. That's what I've found, anyway. Looking back, the law of attraction celebs tend to have this odd mix of a well-fed ego, bits of universal spiritual truth, and an undeniable charisma. Good stuff in moderation and discernment. (07-19-2012, 05:40 PM)Ebennett Wrote: In Ra's terms how would the LOA be described. I know this is a broad question but the like attracts like definition from Ra?
07-19-2012, 06:31 PM
49:5 Wrote:The negative pole is the south pole or the lower pole. The north or upper pole is positive. The crisscrossings of these spiraling energies form primary, secondary, and tertiary energy centers. You are familiar with the primary energy centers of the physical, mental, and spiritual body complex. Secondary points of the crisscrossing of positive and negative center orientation revolve about several of your centers. The yellow-ray center may be seen to have secondary energy centers in elbow, in knee, and in the subtle bodies at a slight spacing from the physical vehicle at points describing diamonds about the entity’s navel area surrounding the body. 49:6 Wrote:We have two types of energy. We are attempting then, as entities in any true color of this octave, to move the meeting place of inner and outer natures further and further along or upward along the energy centers. The two methods of approaching this with sensible method are first, the seating within one’s self of those experiences which are attracted to the entity through the south pole. Each experience will need to be observed, experienced, balanced, accepted, and seated within the individual. As the entity grows in self-acceptance and awareness of catalyst the location of the comfortable seating of these experiences will rise to the new true-color entity. The experience, whatever it may be, will be seated in red ray and considered as to its survival content and so forth. 72:17 Wrote:The energies of life itself, being the One Infinite Creator, flow from the south pole of the body seen in its magnetic form. Thus only the Creator may, through the feet, enter the energy shell of the body to any effect. Is this what you've meant by 'Law of Attraction', Ebennett?
Thank you Ankh but its going to be a while before I am able to interpret this
![]() If light is what the creator uses to get a reflection of itself what is the factor that allows the reflection to happen? (07-19-2012, 07:34 PM)Ebennett Wrote: Thank you Ankh but its going to be a while before I am able to interpret this http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=5073 Wrote:The ratio of love versus light is always one to one. 1/1 = 1 1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1... = 1 ![]() There is only One and the factor is LOVE and is holographic in nature. The whole of the One is contained in each "part" of the One.
Maybe an overview of the LOO cosmology may help.
Summary of the cosmology from the Ra material. 1) The first known thing in creation is infinity. The infinity is creation. 2) Infinity became aware (intelligent infinity). 3) Intelligent Infinity became aware of the concept of free will. 4) It realized It was even free to consider the idea of many-ness, that is, more than one. Free will immediately gives rise to many-ness. 5) Intelligent Infinity decided to explore this idea. In so doing Intelligent Infinity became the Creator. 6) The 1st distortion, free will, finds focus. This is the 2nd distortion the Creative Principle or Love. (Love may be seen as the type of energy of an extremely high order which causes intelligent energy to be formed from the potential of intelligent infinity in a particular way. All Love emanates from the Oneness.) 7) Love uses Its intelligent energy to create a certain pattern of illusions or densities in order to satisfy Its own intelligent estimate of a method of knowing itself. 8) This intelligent energy thus creates a distortion known as Light. From these 3 distortions come many, many hierarchies of distortions each having its own paradoxes to be synthesized, no one being any more important than another. 9) Due to the infinite possibilities of intelligent infinity, there is no ending to many-ness. The exploration thus is free to continue infinitely into an eternal present. ------------- Not from the Ra material, but I like this explanation. Camillo Loken Wrote:The Cosmic Law of Attraction insists that all things similar in nature will naturally gravitate to one another and magnetize one another into their own field. This applies to all things in the Universe; it also applies to thought. Thought is energy and it is magnetic to those things with a similar vibration
07-19-2012, 08:36 PM
(07-19-2012, 05:40 PM)Ebennett Wrote: In Ra's terms how would the LOA be described. I know this is a broad question but the like attracts like definition from Ra? Ra never gives an explicit definition of the law of attraction. But they do talk about it in a roundabout way, as can be seen in the following exchanges: Quote:16.54 Questioner: Do things like daydreams become real in other densities? And also: Quote:50.2 Questioner: In the last session you made the statement that experiences are attracted into the entity through the south pole. Could you expand on that and give us a definition of what you mean?
07-19-2012, 08:38 PM
Patrick, that is probably the best summary of Ra's cosmology I have seen.
07-19-2012, 09:17 PM
I would rather call the Law of Attraction the Law of Attraction/Repulsion. Also the Law of Electromagnetism, or the Law of Gravity. But perhaps my preferred terms would be the Law of Resonance, as it is much more accurate in my personal opinion.
Quote:If light is what the creator uses to get a reflection of itself what is the factor that allows the reflection to happen? The very beingness of this Love/Thought/Focus! The "moment" there gathers a Focus or Logos, the moment all light manifests or appears. There is no matter, there is no light, there is no reflection unless there is an observation being made upon it. In order for an observation to be, there must be the will(force/power) to observe first. And to observe is to form: to arrange light out of "nothingness" into manifestation. And that nothingness is the plenum of everything. Many people upon this planet are now (becoming) sufficiently aware of this fact, that there are no atoms, no photons, unless there is an observer to observe them. This observer is consciousness or thought, and this is the focus, the Creator, or Creative Principle. And that is Love. The only means to observe yourself is through light. This is how the Creator experiences itself. And this is the purpose of the Creation/Kosmos.
07-19-2012, 10:09 PM
Thank you Patrick for your overview wich I needed, and Siren to get at very the basis of my question and everyone else on this thread, deeply appreciative to be able to fit this perfect puzzle alot better in my head. I will be chewing on this for a while thanks.
07-20-2012, 07:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-20-2012, 07:57 PM by AnthroHeart.)
(07-19-2012, 09:17 PM)Siren Wrote: Many people upon this planet are now (becoming) sufficiently aware of this fact, that there are no atoms, no photons, unless there is an observer to observe them. This observer is consciousness or thought, and this is the focus, the Creator, or Creative Principle. And that is Love. If Creator is the one observing, then atoms and photons always exist. I agree with you about observer being consciousness. It's not just us humans. Wild animals, and even plants, and a rock have a level of consciousness sufficient to form material. Then this goes into realms of light, nonphysical. Whatever particles or waves constitute them, the observer is Creator. What you say has more truth than many realize. |
|