11-21-2013, 03:19 PM
I agree with much of what you have said, Austin and GLB. I would like to add a few observations of my own.
I also see the bias of the 'instrument', but no so much their general world view. The bias I see is mostly a matter of language/semantics. With any conscious channeling, the channel is accessing the instrument's language and typically doesn't actually speak the language at all. As a result, the channel uses the same wording the instrument would normally, including mispronunciation of words, the wrong word, or poor grammar. This bias is even more glaringly obvious coming from other channels besides L/L due to Carla's bias towards good grammar/pronunciation. I think this bias of language is often mistook for the instrument's own conscious bias.
I would also like to reemphasize what Gary said about Don. I think a very large chunk of the Ra contact was due to Don's presence/questioning.
I also see the bias of the 'instrument', but no so much their general world view. The bias I see is mostly a matter of language/semantics. With any conscious channeling, the channel is accessing the instrument's language and typically doesn't actually speak the language at all. As a result, the channel uses the same wording the instrument would normally, including mispronunciation of words, the wrong word, or poor grammar. This bias is even more glaringly obvious coming from other channels besides L/L due to Carla's bias towards good grammar/pronunciation. I think this bias of language is often mistook for the instrument's own conscious bias.
I would also like to reemphasize what Gary said about Don. I think a very large chunk of the Ra contact was due to Don's presence/questioning.